CaliforniaHayward

We Care Skilled Nursing Facility

21863 Vallejo Street, Hayward, CA 94541 · Alameda County · 28 certified beds · avg 27 residents/day · certified since Dec 11, 2019

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 19, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Apr 22, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Apr 22, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 22, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202270E
202380F
202410D
2025110E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.984.313.95bottom 40% in California; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.340.610.69bottom 18% in California; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.763.903.50top 49% in California; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.510.48bottom 39% in California; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.536.745.8bottom 12% in California; bottom 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.90, RN 0.34, weekend 3.68. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Jain, AshitIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12/05/2017
We Care Skilled Nursing FacilityOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2017
Jain, AshitIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2017
Jain, AshitIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2017
Jain, AshitIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2017
Jain, AshitIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/22/2020
Ponder, AldwinIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Ponder, AldwinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Ponder, AldwinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
We Care Skilled Nursing FacilityOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2017
We Care Skilled Nursing FacilityOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bethesda Home0.3 miHayward, CA★★★☆☆4/5
St Anthony Care Center0.4 miHayward, CA★★★★★5/5
Morton Bakar Center0.6 miHayward, CA★★★★★5/5
Golden Harbor Healthcare Center0.6 miHayward, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Serenethos Care Center, LLC0.8 miHayward, CA★★★★★5/5
Baywood Court Health Center0.8 miCastro Valley, CA★★★★★5/5
Hayward Gardens Post Acute1.1 miHayward, CA★★★★★4/5
Hayward Hills Health Care Center1.1 miHayward, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Sage Post Acute1.1 miHayward, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Canyon Creek Post-Acute1.3 miCastro Valley, CA★★★★☆4/5
East Bay Post-Acute1.4 miCastro Valley, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Valley Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.4 miCastro Valley, CA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hayward →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555914.