CaliforniaPleasanton

Creekview Skilled Nursing

2900 Stoneridge Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588 · Alameda County · 73 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Dec 17, 2015

Part of chain: CONTINUING LIFE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 4.8★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Apr 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Apr 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Nov 15, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 15, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 15, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930E
202380F
202510D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.394.313.95top 9% in California; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.050.610.69top 10% in California; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.903.903.50top 8% in California; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.760.510.48top 13% in California; top 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.336.745.8top 34% in California; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9top 1% in California; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.05, RN 0.98, weekend 4.59. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Aschenbrenner, RichardIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest20%03/18/2011
Bourne, TroyIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest8%03/18/2011
Currie, RyanIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest8%03/18/2011
Spieker 2010 Irrv Childrens TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest24%01/01/2010
Spieker CLC LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest60%03/18/2011
Spieker Living TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest36%03/18/2011
Spieker, WarrenIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest27%03/18/2011
Continuing Life, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2014
Griffin, EzekielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/02/2017
Jorgensen-Kares, DarolynIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2013
McElroy, PatrickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pleasanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center2.8 miPleasanton, CA★★★★★5/5
The Vineyards Healthcare Center4.0 miLivermore, CA★★★★★5/5
Stratford Villa Post-Acute4.1 miLivermore, CA★★★★☆3/5
Avondale Villa Post-Acute4.1 miLivermore, CA★★★★☆3/5
The Reutlinger Community7.7 miDanville, CA★★★★☆4/5
Niles Canyon Post Acute10.8 miFremont, CA★★★★★5/5
Masonic Home10.9 miUnion City, CA★★★★☆4/5
Vista Post Acute11.0 miHayward, CA★★★★☆4/5
Mission Valley Post Acute11.8 miFremont, CA★★★★☆3/5
We Care Skilled Nursing - Fremont11.8 miFremont, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Country Drive Post Acute11.8 miFremont, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Crestwood Treatment Center11.9 miFremont, CA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pleasanton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555895.