Springs at Lake Pointe Woods
3280 Lake Pointe Blvd, Sarasota, FL 34231 · Sarasota County · 101 certified beds · avg 96 residents/day · certified since Dec 3, 1986
Part of chain: SUMMIT CARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Sep 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 26, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jul 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 26, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jul 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (21)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 26, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Sep 19, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Apr 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| Dec 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 3, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 3, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Mar 3, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
6 fines totaling $51,671.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | Fine | $28,815 |
| Sep 19, 2024 | Fine | $10,039 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | Fine | $3,962 |
| Dec 14, 2023 | Fine | $3,962 |
| Oct 30, 2023 | Fine | $1,748 |
| Oct 10, 2023 | Fine | $3,145 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.64 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in Florida; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 35% in Florida; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.35 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 27% in Florida; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 12% in Florida; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.9 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 19% in Florida; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 65.2 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 17% in Florida; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.68, RN 0.59, weekend 3.38. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH Summit Care Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/02/2023 |
| Madison SNF Operations LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/02/2023 |
| Seam Ny 2020 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/04/2023 |
| SK Summit Care II Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/02/2023 |
| Summit Care Group II Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/02/2023 |
| Fehr, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/28/2025 |
| Fehr, Scott | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/28/2025 |
| Houston, Richard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2026 |
| McManus, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/04/2023 |
| McManus, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/03/2023 |
| Summit Care Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/04/2023 |
| Summit Care Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bay Village of Sarasota | 0.7 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| PR SNF Operations LLC | 2.0 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Glenridge on Palmer Ranch INC. | 2.3 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Crescent Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Creekside Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.6 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sarasota Memorial Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Aviata at Sarasota | 5.6 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sunnyside Nursing Home | 6.1 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center | 6.1 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Harborview Sarasota | 6.9 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at Beneva | 7.1 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105567.