FloridaSarasota

Aviata at Beneva

741 South Beneva Road, Sarasota, FL 34232 · Sarasota County · 120 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Sep 10, 1982

Abuse citation flag (CMS)SFF Candidate

Part of chain: AVIATA HEALTH GROUP (50 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
6
Serious findings on record
$110,129
Fines, last 3 years
4.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 9, 2026 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Feb 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 9, 2026 · F-0835

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Feb 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 9, 2026 · F-0865

The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.

Why it matters: Without a real quality improvement process, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Feb 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jan 9, 2026 · F-0926

The facility did not have policies on smoking.

Why it matters: Without clear smoking rules, residents face fire hazards and unwanted secondhand smoke.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Feb 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 13, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 13, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 9, 2026▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 9, 2026▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Jan 9, 2026▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Jan 9, 2026▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not have policies on smoking.
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Aug 13, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 13, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Oct 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Oct 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Oct 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Oct 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Aug 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Nov 18, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130F
2023110E
202572G ▲
202694L ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $110,129.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 19, 2025Fine$74,665
Aug 13, 2025Fine$35,464

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.234.033.95top 25% in Florida; top 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.660.760.69bottom 49% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.853.683.50top 26% in Florida; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.530.48bottom 28% in Florida; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.541.445.8bottom 28% in Florida; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)53.846.042.9bottom 34% in Florida; bottom 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.60, RN 0.56, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
741 S Beneva Rd Opco Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
741 S Beneva Rd Opco Parent LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Aspire Mgt LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Dagan, AmitaiIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Freund, NochumIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Freund, NochumIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Goldberger, AbrahamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Goldberger, FaigyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Herskowitz, EliezerIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Herskowitz, YaakovIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Rizzo, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Rizzo, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Travitsky, AaronIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Williams, ReginaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/11/2025
Williams, ReginaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/11/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Birchwood Health and Rehabilitation Center0.6 miSarasota, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Harborview Sarasota1.6 miSarasota, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center1.7 miSarasota, FL★★★★☆3/5
Aviata at Sarasota1.9 miSarasota, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Vivo Healthcare Meadows2.1 miSarasota, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Benderson Family Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center2.1 miSarasota, FL★★★★★5/5
Sunnyside Nursing Home2.4 miSarasota, FL★★★★★4/5
Indian Beach Nursing and Rehab Center2.5 miSarasota, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center2.5 miSarasota, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pines of Sarasota2.6 miSarasota, FL★★★★★4/5
Inn at Sarasota Bay Club3.1 miSarasota, FL★★★★☆3/5
Siesta Key Health and Rehabilitation Center3.2 miSarasota, FL★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sarasota →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105416.