How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
800 SE Central Pkwy, Stuart, FL 34994 (opens Google Maps) · Martin County · (772) 287-9912· 177 certified beds · avg 171 residents/day · certified since Mar 22, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SOLARIS HEALTHCARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 24, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 17, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Mar 24, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.81 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 45% in Florida; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 50% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.48 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 43% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 40% in Florida; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 20.8 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 7% in Florida; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 16.7 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 6% in Florida; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.64, RN 0.64, weekend 3.31.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.64 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Solaris Healthcare Parkway. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parkway Healthcare Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/20/2015 |
| Solaris Foundation INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/06/2015 |
| Solaris Healthcare Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/06/2015 |
| Bayerlein, Denise | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Bayerlein, Denise | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Bayerlein, Denise | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Bell, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Bell, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Bell, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Berkowitz, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Blakeslee, Danielle | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2020 |
| Blakeslee, Danielle | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2020 |
| Blakeslee, Danielle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2020 |
| Buxbaum, Miriam | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Corley, Shawn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Corley, Shawn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Corley, Shawn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Corley, Shawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Fadel, Ahmad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Herzka, Chaim | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Solaris Healthcare — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stuart Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 0.6 mi | Stuart, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation | 2.1 mi | Palm City, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Palm City Nursing & Rehab Center | 3.0 mi | Palm City, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Seabranch Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Stuart, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Port Saint Lucie | 7.3 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tiffany Hall Nursing and Rehab Center | 7.9 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Palm Garden of Port Saint Lucie | 8.1 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Martin Coast Center for Rehabilitation and Healthc | 8.4 mi | Hobe Sound, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Savannas Park Health and Rehabilitation Center | 8.6 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Port St Lucie Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 12.5 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ardie R Copas State Veterans Nursing Home | 14.3 mi | Port Saint Lucie, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Jupiter Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 18.2 mi | Jupiter, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105687.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details