How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
671 North Cherokee Road, Social Circle, GA 30025 (opens Google Maps) · Walton County · (770) 464-2019· 65 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint F-0693
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint · F-0693 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint · F-0919 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jul 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jul 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Georgia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.49 | 3.54 | 3.95 | top 47% in Georgia; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.69 | bottom 45% in Georgia; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.14 | 3.09 | 3.50 | top 39% in Georgia; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.20 | 0.35 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Georgia; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.9 | 46.0 | 45.8 | bottom 32% in Georgia; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 44.5 | 42.9 | top 39% in Georgia; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.40, weekend 3.09.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Social Circle Nsg & Rehab Ctr. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bender, Sara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2025 |
| Bender, Sara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2025 |
| Bobo, Latoya | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2018 |
| Bobo, Latoya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2018 |
| Cypress Skilled Nursing LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Cypress Skilled Nursing LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2025 |
| Ford, Vernita | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/03/2025 |
| Ford, Vernita | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/03/2025 |
| Jackson, Donna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2021 |
| Jackson, Donna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2021 |
| Johnson, Jason | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2022 |
| Johnson, Jason | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2022 |
| Macatula, Maria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2017 |
| Macatula, Maria | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2017 |
| Nordholm, Katherine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Nordholm, Katherine | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Ovits, Isaac | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Ovits, Isaac | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Ovits, Isaac | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Patterson, Dianne | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2018 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cypress Skilled Nursing — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Place Nursing Facility | 9.4 mi | Monroe, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Riverside Health Care Center | 9.7 mi | Covington, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pruitthealth - Covington | 10.2 mi | Covington, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Madison Health and Rehab | 14.5 mi | Madison, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Westbury Center of Conyers for Nursing and Healing | 16.5 mi | Conyers, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Rockdale Healthcare Center | 17.0 mi | Conyers, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| High Shoals Health and Rehabilitation | 18.2 mi | Bishop, GA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115532.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details