How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
125 Samaritan Drive, Cumming, GA 30040 (opens Google Maps) · Forsyth County · (770) 889-0120· 150 certified beds · avg 130 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808 |
| Feb 2, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint · F-0730 |
| Feb 2, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Feb 2, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · from a complaint · F-0814 |
| Feb 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Feb 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Feb 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Feb 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 12).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 12 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Georgia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.56 | 3.54 | 3.95 | top 43% in Georgia; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.69 | bottom 27% in Georgia; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.25 | 3.09 | 3.50 | top 32% in Georgia; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.48 | bottom 34% in Georgia; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 73.8 | 46.0 | 45.8 | bottom 3% in Georgia; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 44.5 | 42.9 | bottom 27% in Georgia; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.60, RN 0.32, weekend 3.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.60 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Chestnut Ridge Nsg & Rehab Ctr. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enin Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2013 |
| SNF Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2013 |
| Bender, Sara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2025 |
| Bender, Sara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2025 |
| Cypress Skilled Nursing LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Cypress Skilled Nursing LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2025 |
| Macatula, Maria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2017 |
| Macatula, Maria | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2017 |
| Moss, Brent | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/05/2025 |
| Moss, Brent | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/05/2025 |
| Nardiello, Elizabeth | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2018 |
| Nardiello, Elizabeth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2018 |
| Nordholm, Katherine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Nordholm, Katherine | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Ovits, Isaac | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Ovits, Isaac | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Ovits, Isaac | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Patterson, Dianne | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/07/2018 |
| Patterson, Dianne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/07/2018 |
| Patterson, Dianne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/07/2018 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cypress Skilled Nursing — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumming Operating Company LLC | 0.9 mi | Cumming, GA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pruitthealth - Lanier | 9.7 mi | Buford, GA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| D Scott Hudgens Center for Skilled Nursing, the | 12.7 mi | Suwanee, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Salude - the Art of Recovery | 13.2 mi | Suwanee, GA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Crossroads of Flowery Branch of Journey LLC, the | 13.5 mi | Flowery Branch, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Roswell Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 17.4 mi | Roswell, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Ctr of Lawrenceville | 17.9 mi | Lawrenceville, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Delmar Gardens of Gwinnett | 18.8 mi | Lawrenceville, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cherokee Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 19.0 mi | Canton, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court at Lanier Village Estates | 19.5 mi | Gainesville, GA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Canton Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 19.9 mi | Canton, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115423.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details