GeorgiaBremen

Haralson Nsg & Rehab Center

315 Field Street, Bremen, GA 30110 · Haralson County · 120 certified beds · avg 97 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1989

Part of chain: CYPRESS SKILLED NURSING (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$8,948
Fines, last 3 years
3.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 15, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has plan of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 21, 2022 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 23, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 21, 2022 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 23, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 11, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jul 21, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Jul 21, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 21, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jul 21, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jul 21, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 21, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jul 21, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 21, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022172G ▲
202420E
202581G ▲
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,948, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 15, 2025Fine$8,948
Apr 15, 2025Payment Denial23 days from Jun 14, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityGeorgia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.513.543.95top 45% in Georgia; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.250.500.69bottom 13% in Georgia; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.303.093.50top 28% in Georgia; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.180.350.48bottom 19% in Georgia; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)61.546.045.8bottom 11% in Georgia; bottom 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)75.044.542.9bottom 10% in Georgia; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.35, RN 0.24, weekend 3.14. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bender, SaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/02/2025
Bender, SaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/02/2025
Caldwell, LeighanaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2024
Caldwell, LeighanaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2024
Cotton, KeshaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2023
Cotton, KeshaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2023
Cypress Skilled Nursing LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Cypress Skilled Nursing LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2025
Langley, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2021
Langley, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2021
Macatula, MariaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2017
Macatula, MariaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2017
McKey, JennaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/14/2022
McKey, JennaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/14/2022
Moore, XavierIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2023
Moore, XavierIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2023
Mote, KaylaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2022
Mote, KaylaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2022
Nordholm, KatherineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Nordholm, KatherineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Countryside Post Acute6.3 miBuchanan, GA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Buchanan Healthcare Center6.6 miBuchanan, GA★☆☆☆☆3/5
Pine Knoll Path of Journey LLC10.0 miCarrollton, GA★☆☆☆☆3/5
Pruitthealth - Carrollton11.0 miCarrollton, GA★★★★☆4/5
Carrollton Crossing of Journey LLC13.6 miCarrollton, GA★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Carrollton Manor, Incorporated14.2 miCarrollton, GA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bremen →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115431.