OklahomaSkiatook

Skiatook Nursing Home,llc

318 South Cherry, Skiatook, OK 74070 · Osage County · 70 certified beds · avg 39 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1997

Part of chain: OKLAHOMA NURSING HOMES, LTD. (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 12, 2022 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 1, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
May 12, 2022▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
May 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202261J ▲
202310D
202430E
202520D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.174.583.95top 21% in Oklahoma; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.380.410.69bottom 50% in Oklahoma; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.024.163.50top 13% in Oklahoma; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.280.48bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.855.545.8bottom 40% in Oklahoma; bottom 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.50, RN 0.33, weekend 4.38. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cheek, BarnieIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest8%01/11/2005
Estep, PatsyIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%01/01/2022
Haskins, LloydIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%02/08/2023
McGrew, JustinIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%03/05/2005
Sandra Cheek Farmer TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest8%11/01/2005
Steven R. Tubbs Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest14%01/01/2023
Carolyn D Leaverton Revocable TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Johnson, MelissaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
McGrew, JustinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Sandra Cheek Farmer TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
North County Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation8.6 miCollinsville, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Sequoyah Pointe Living Center10.7 miOwasso, OK★★★★☆4/5
The Highlands at Owasso10.7 miOwasso, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Green Country Care Center11.6 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Baptist Village of Owasso12.2 miOwasso, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Saint Simeons Episcopal Home12.8 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆4/5
Barnsdall Nursing Home15.8 miBarnsdall, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
Sand Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation15.9 miSand Springs, OK★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Oklahoma Memory Care Institute17.4 miTulsa, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Trinity Woods, INC.17.7 miTulsa, OK★★★★★5/5
Tulsa Nursing Center17.8 miTulsa, OK★★★★☆3/5
Emerald Care Center Tulsa17.9 miTulsa, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Skiatook →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375293.