How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Gold Crest Care Center
2316 Bruner Avenue, Bronx, NY 10469 (opens Google Maps) · Bronx County · (718) 882-6400· 175 certified beds · avg 165 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE MAYER FAMILY (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 5, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. F-0553
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Feb 5, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Feb 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 5, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location. · F-0848 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623 |
| Jul 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jul 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jul 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jul 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.98
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.64
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.56
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.98 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 26% in New York; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 39% in New York; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.56 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 23% in New York; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 30% in New York; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 36.1 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 44% in New York; top 27% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 46.2 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 32% in New York; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.73, RN 0.60, weekend 3.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.73 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Gold Crest Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appel, Anna | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/01/2012 |
| Eisikowicz, Sam | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/01/2012 |
| Kirsch, Roslyn | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/01/2012 |
| Klein, Rivky | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/01/2012 |
| Landa, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 02/11/1996 |
| Lerman, Betty | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/15/2010 |
| Luba Schulsinger Estate | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 06/21/2024 |
| Mayer, Andrea | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 02/11/1996 |
| Mayer, Giorgio | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 02/11/1996 |
| Rothenberg, Helene | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/15/2010 |
| Salamon, Menajem | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/01/2022 |
| Bauer, Hershi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/12/2020 |
| Gewirtz, Jonathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2007 |
| Gewirtz, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2007 |
| Landa, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/11/1996 |
| Silberberg, Chaim | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/02/2022 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Mayer Family — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Independence Care Center for Nursing and Rehabilit — Riverdale, NY · overall 2/5
- Oak Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center — Ithaca, NY · overall 2/5
- River View Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center — Owego, NY · overall 3/5
- Sunnyside Care Center — East Syracuse, NY · overall 2/5
- Valley View Manor Nursing Home — Norwich, NY · overall 3/5
- Wellsville Manor Care Center — Wellsville, NY · overall 5/5
- Pawtucket Falls Healthcare Center — Pawtucket, RI · overall 1/5
- Whitney Rehabilitation Care Center — Hamden, CT · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "Does your admission agreement include an arbitration clause, and is signing it optional?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 36% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 16 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 267 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kings Harbor Multicare Cente | 0.2 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| East Haven Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 0.5 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Eastchester Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 0.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Morris Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.0 mi | Bronx, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Workmens Circle Multicare Center | 1.1 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Pelham Parkway Nursing Care and Rehabilitation Fac | 1.2 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Williamsbridge Center for Rehabilitation and Nrsg | 1.2 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pinnacle Multicare Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent | 1.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regeis Care Center | 1.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Morningside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Split Rock Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 1.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Archcare at Providence Rest | 1.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Bronx, NY — 44 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Grand Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Bronx, NY · overall —/5abuseSFF
- Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale — Riverdale, NY · overall 5/5
- Highbridge Woodycrest Center — Bronx, NY · overall 4/5
- Hope Center for Hiv and Nursing Care — Bronx, NY · overall 1/5
- Hudson Pointe at Riverdale Center for Nursing and — Bronx, NY · overall 2/5
- Independence Care Center for Nursing and Rehabilit — Riverdale, NY · overall 2/5
- Laconia Nursing Home — Bronx, NY · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335079.