Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community

625 Robert Fulton Highway, Quarryville, PA 17566 (opens Google Maps) · Lancaster County · (717) 786-7321· 130 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1975 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Aug 30, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.36

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Aug 30, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. F-0565
Aug 30, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
Aug 30, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Aug 30, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565
Aug 30, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Aug 30, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 30, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552
Aug 30, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607
Aug 30, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Aug 30, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Aug 30, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Aug 30, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Aug 30, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Jul 10, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661
Jul 10, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 10).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2024

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2024	2	0	D
2025	10	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

4.36

3.94

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.94

0.80

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.07

3.58

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Pennsylvania avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.36	3.94	3.95	top 27% in Pennsylvania; top 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.94	0.80	0.69	top 23% in Pennsylvania; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.07	3.58	3.50	top 24% in Pennsylvania; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.60	0.56	0.48	top 31% in Pennsylvania; top 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	20.7	44.5	45.8	top 3% in Pennsylvania; top 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	11.1	39.9	42.9	top 5% in Pennsylvania; top 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.87, RN 0.83, weekend 3.62.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.87 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Church related

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Aston, Diane	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	11/26/2007
Aston, Diane	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/26/2007
Clausen, Joel	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2008
Clausen, Joel	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2008
Fiol, Bruce	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/17/1997
Harr, Thomas	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/12/2012
Hartzell, Charles	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/02/2011
Hartzell, Charles	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/12/2012
Hayward, Robert	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2004
Hayward, Robert	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/22/1993
Hayward, Robert	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2004
Mackenzie, George	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/21/2005
Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company	Organization	5% or Greater Mortgage Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/26/2000
Peters, Bruce	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	10/21/1994
Peters, Bruce	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/24/2008
Richardson, Guy	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/28/2005
Richardson, Guy	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/14/2011
Schempp, David	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	06/06/2014
Sneller, Jonathan	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/11/2011
Vangilst, Mark	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/21/2004

Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
"What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
"What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 21% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 24 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Lakeside at Willow Valley	8.9 mi	Willow Street, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Glen at Willow Valley	10.1 mi	Lancaster, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Newport Meadows Health and Rehabilitation Center	10.3 mi	Christiana, PA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Oxford Health Center	11.9 mi	Oxford, PA	★★★★☆	4/5
Lancaster Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	12.4 mi	Lancaster, PA	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Rose City Nursing and Rehab at Lancaster	13.3 mi	Lancaster, PA	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Hamilton Arms Center	13.4 mi	Lancaster, PA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Abbeyville Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent	13.8 mi	Lancaster, PA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Homestead Village, INC	14.9 mi	Lancaster, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Garden Spot Village	15.5 mi	New Holland, PA	★★★★★	4/5
Trillium Place	15.7 mi	Lancaster, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Preston Residence	15.7 mi	West Grove, PA	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Lancaster, PA — 31 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Rehabilitation Center at Brethren Village LLC — Lancaster, PA · overall 5/5
St Anne's Retirement Community — Columbia, PA · overall 5/5
Susquehanna Health and Wellness Center — Columbia, PA · overall 3/5
United Zion Retirement Communi — Lititz, PA · overall 5/5
Zerbe Sisters Nursing Center, — Narvon, PA · overall 5/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Quarryville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395336.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

The Care File

Visit checklist — Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community

625 Robert Fulton Highway, Quarryville, PA 17566 · (717) 786-7321

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
☐ "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
☐ "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
☐ "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 21% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 395336 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)