OhioSylvania

Otterbein Sunset Village

9640 Sylvania-Metamora Road, Sylvania, OH 43560 · Lucas County · 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Mar 20, 2002

Part of chain: OTTERBEIN SENIORLIFE (20 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Feb 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Feb 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint
Dec 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 18, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 18, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 9, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Oct 9, 2019C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019100F
202270E
202340F
2024100F
202530D
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.543.453.95top 34% in Ohio; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.650.600.69top 32% in Ohio; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.163.073.50top 34% in Ohio; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.420.48bottom 40% in Ohio; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.948.745.8top 24% in Ohio; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.443.942.9top 38% in Ohio; top 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.68, weekend 3.31. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Otterbein HomeOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/01/2021
Otterbein LSC LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2016
App, LynnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Baker, SteveIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Barnes, DorothyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Barnes, DorothyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Barnes, DorothyIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Bartlett, VictoriaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Bayliff, BeckyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Brownson, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Brymer, GeorgeIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Brymer, GeorgeIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Burke, DanielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Butchko, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Butchko, JohnIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Coleman, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Fraley, RalphIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Functional Pathways of Tennessee LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2018
Functional Pathways of Tennessee LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Galbut, AbrahamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lakes of Sylvania, the1.0 miSylvania, OH★★★★★5/5
Kingston Health Center of Sylvania3.3 miSylvania, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Rosary Care Center3.6 miSylvania, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Arbors at Sylvania4.4 miToledo, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Franciscan Care Ctr Sylvania4.9 miToledo, OH★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Divine Rehabilitation and Nursing at Sylvania5.7 miSylvania, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Spring Meadows Nursing, a Villa Center7.5 miHolland, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Otterbein Sunset House7.8 miToledo, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Lutheran Village at Wolfcreek8.8 miHolland, OH★★★★☆3/5
Elizabeth Scott Community8.8 miMaumee, OH★★★★☆4/5
Ayden Healthcare of Toledo8.9 miToledo, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Continuing Healthcare of Toledo9.0 miToledo, OH★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sylvania →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366242.