OklahomaDurant

Oakridge Nursing Center

1100 Oak Ridge Drive, Durant, OK 74701 · Bryan County · 104 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1999

Part of chain: ELMBROOK MANAGEMENT COMPANY (11 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$14,069
Fines, last 3 years
4.28
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 12, 2025 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 12, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Oct 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260E
202370E
202571J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,069.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 12, 2025Fine$14,069

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.284.583.95bottom 36% in Oklahoma; top 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.410.69bottom 48% in Oklahoma; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.794.163.50bottom 28% in Oklahoma; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.280.48top 20% in Oklahoma; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)77.055.545.8bottom 7% in Oklahoma; bottom 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)85.753.642.9bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.31, weekend 3.16. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Durant Oak Operating Co LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/26/2021
Coble, TomIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Coble, TomIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Coble, TomIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Durant Oak Operating Co LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Durant Oak Operating Co LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Lodes, JasonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2023
Lodes, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2023
Lodes, JasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2023
Plumb, ImranIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2023
Plumb, ImranIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2023
Taylor, BrendaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/17/2024
Taylor, BrendaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/17/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Four Seasons Rehabilitation & Care0.2 miDurant, OK★☆☆☆☆3/5
The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home2.6 miDurant, OK★★★★☆3/5
Calera Manor11.1 miCalera, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
Southern Pointe Living Center12.9 miColbert, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Homestead of Denison18.9 miDenison, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Avir at Memorial19.2 miDenison, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Family Care Center of Kingston19.8 miKingston, OK★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Durant →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375360.