OklahomaArdmore

Elmbrook Home

1811 9th Avenue NW, Ardmore, OK 73401 · Carter County · 126 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Mar 14, 1994

Part of chain: ELMBROOK MANAGEMENT COMPANY (11 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.40
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 13, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 13, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Aug 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Aug 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202410D
202590E
202621G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.404.583.95bottom 41% in Oklahoma; top 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.410.69top 14% in Oklahoma; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.554.163.50bottom 17% in Oklahoma; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.280.48top 37% in Oklahoma; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.855.545.8top 27% in Oklahoma; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.953.642.9top 34% in Oklahoma; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.51, RN 0.48, weekend 2.83. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Coble, TomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2018
Elmbrook Home, INC.OrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2008
Elmbrook Properties INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2008
Coble, TomIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2018
Coble, TomIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2018
Coble, TomIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2018
Dixson, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Dixson, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2018
Elmbrook Home, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2008
Elmbrook Home, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2008
Elmbrook Properties INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2008
Elmbrook Properties INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2008
Lodes, JasonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Lodes, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Lodes, JasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Stevenson, AmandaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2018
Stevenson, AmandaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Southbrook Healthcare, INC1.5 miArdmore, OK★★★★★5/5
Ardmore Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare2.1 miArdmore, OK★★★☆☆5/5
Woodview Home, INC.2.7 miArdmore, OK★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Ardmore →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375160.