101 Sherrard Drive, Colbert, OK 74733 (opens Google Maps) · Bryan County · (580) 296-4500· 95 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Sep 19, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BGM ESTATE (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 8, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 8, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. F-0727
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. · from a complaint · F-0563 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jan 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583 |
| Jan 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint · F-0622 |
| Jan 2, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 14 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 2 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $38,445.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2025 | Fine | $38,445 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.39 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Oklahoma; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.69 | bottom 34% in Oklahoma; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.73 | 4.16 | 3.50 | bottom 2% in Oklahoma; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 44% in Oklahoma; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 72.5 | 55.5 | 45.8 | bottom 11% in Oklahoma; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 85.7 | 53.6 | 42.9 | bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 1.87, RN 0.24, weekend 2.13.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (1.87 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Southern Pointe Living Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bypass Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 12/06/2021 |
| Mitchell, Kelly | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/28/2020 |
| Mitchell, Marcinda | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/28/2020 |
| Mitchell, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/28/2020 |
| MRTL Deduction Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/07/2021 |
| Philip M. Green Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/28/2020 |
| Philip Marion Green Exempt Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 12/08/2021 |
| Tabor, Angela | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/28/2020 |
| Tiffany Seay Exempt Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 04/06/2022 |
| Belt, Miranda | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2024 |
| Pitts, Jaci | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2024 |
| Taylor, Sandra | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2020 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain BGM Estate — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calera Manor | 3.9 mi | Calera, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Homestead of Denison | 6.2 mi | Denison, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avir at Memorial | 6.4 mi | Denison, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites | 7.7 mi | Denison, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Denison Nursing and Rehab | 8.1 mi | Denison, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Beacon Hill | 9.7 mi | Denison, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home | 11.7 mi | Durant, OK | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oakridge Nursing Center | 12.9 mi | Durant, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Four Seasons Rehabilitation & Care | 12.9 mi | Durant, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avir at Sherman | 13.3 mi | Sherman, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Texoma Healthcare Center | 13.9 mi | Sherman, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Family Care Center of Kingston | 16.0 mi | Kingston, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375469.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details