Southern Pointe Living Center
101 Sherrard Drive, Colbert, OK 74733 · Bryan County · 95 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Sep 19, 2004
Part of chain: BGM ESTATE (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 8, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Apr 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 8, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Apr 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (25)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. · from a complaint |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint |
| Jan 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint |
| Jan 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Jan 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jan 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jan 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 14, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Jan 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jan 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jan 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jan 14, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 1).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 14 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 2 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $38,445.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2025 | Fine | $38,445 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.39 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Oklahoma; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.69 | bottom 34% in Oklahoma; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.73 | 4.16 | 3.50 | bottom 2% in Oklahoma; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 44% in Oklahoma; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 72.5 | 55.5 | 45.8 | bottom 11% in Oklahoma; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 85.7 | 53.6 | 42.9 | bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 1.87, RN 0.24, weekend 2.13. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bypass Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 12/06/2021 |
| Mitchell, Kelly | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/28/2020 |
| Mitchell, Marcinda | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/28/2020 |
| Mitchell, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/28/2020 |
| MRTL Deduction Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 12/07/2021 |
| Philip M. Green Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/28/2020 |
| Philip Marion Green Exempt Tr Cu Gilbert F Green Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 12/08/2021 |
| Tabor, Angela | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 13% | 12/28/2020 |
| Tiffany Seay Exempt Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 04/06/2022 |
| Belt, Miranda | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2024 |
| Pitts, Jaci | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2024 |
| Taylor, Sandra | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2020 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "What are your visiting policies — can family visit any time the resident wants?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calera Manor | 3.9 mi | Calera, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Homestead of Denison | 6.2 mi | Denison, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avir at Memorial | 6.4 mi | Denison, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites | 7.7 mi | Denison, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Denison Nursing and Rehab | 8.1 mi | Denison, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Beacon Hill | 9.7 mi | Denison, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home | 11.7 mi | Durant, OK | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oakridge Nursing Center | 12.9 mi | Durant, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Four Seasons Rehabilitation & Care | 12.9 mi | Durant, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avir at Sherman | 13.3 mi | Sherman, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Texoma Healthcare Center | 13.9 mi | Sherman, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Family Care Center of Kingston | 16.0 mi | Kingston, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375469.