OklahomaDurant

Four Seasons Rehabilitation & Care

1212 Four Seasons Drive, Durant, OK 74701 · Bryan County · 122 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1995

Part of chain: ELMBROOK MANAGEMENT COMPANY (11 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Oct 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Oct 28, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 28, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (17 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230E
202330E
2024180E
202510E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.884.583.95bottom 14% in Oklahoma; top 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.340.410.69bottom 40% in Oklahoma; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.324.163.50bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.280.48bottom 34% in Oklahoma; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.455.545.8bottom 33% in Oklahoma; bottom 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)66.753.642.9bottom 35% in Oklahoma; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.29, weekend 2.82. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Coble, TomIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Casey, RaymondIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2024
Casey, RaymondIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2024
Coble, TomIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Coble, TomIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Coble, TomIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2021
Elmbrook Management Company, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2020
Elmbrook Management Company, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2025
Lodes, JasonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2023
Lodes, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2023
Lodes, JasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2023
Plumb, ImranIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2023
Plumb, ImranIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Oakridge Nursing Center0.2 miDurant, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home2.4 miDurant, OK★★★★☆3/5
Calera Manor11.1 miCalera, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
Southern Pointe Living Center12.9 miColbert, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Homestead of Denison19.0 miDenison, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Avir at Memorial19.3 miDenison, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Family Care Center of Kingston19.6 miKingston, OK★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Durant →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375238.