Brookside Nursing Center
310 Brookside Drive, Madill, OK 73446 · Marshall County · 140 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1995
Part of chain: ELMBROOK MANAGEMENT COMPANY (11 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 11, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Apr 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 11, 2025 · F-0657 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Why it matters: Delays or gaps in care planning mean staff may work without a clear, current roadmap for the resident's daily care and treatment.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Apr 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 2, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 7, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (8)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 11, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Apr 11, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Aug 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (1 → 1).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $31,530.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2025 | Fine | $31,530 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.58 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 47% in Oklahoma; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.69 | top 31% in Oklahoma; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.19 | 4.16 | 3.50 | top 47% in Oklahoma; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.49 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 8% in Oklahoma; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.7 | 55.5 | 45.8 | bottom 47% in Oklahoma; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 0.39, weekend 3.44. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coble, Tom | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2021 |
| Coble, Tom | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2021 |
| Coble, Tom | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2021 |
| Coble, Tom | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2021 |
| Gordon, Ely | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Gordon, Ely | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Hassanshahi, Amber | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Hassanshahi, Amber | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2025 |
| Hassanshahi, Amber | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Lodes, Jason | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Lodes, Jason | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Lodes, Jason | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Madill Property Co LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2021 |
| Madill Property Co LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2021 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "How do you prepare residents and families for discharge, and what support do you arrange for after they leave?"
- "How quickly are lab tests done and results acted on when a resident's doctor orders them?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Care Center of Kingston | 6.1 mi | Kingston, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Blue River Healthcare, INC | 12.1 mi | Tishomingo, OK | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Calera Manor | 18.1 mi | Calera, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375235.