TexasGeorgetown

Park Place Care Center

121 Fm 971, Georgetown, TX 78626 · Williamson County · 116 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since May 24, 2002

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE (149 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
9
Serious findings on record
$114,392
Fines, last 3 years
3.46
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 9, 2026 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 11, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 9, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 11, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 6, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 3, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 10, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 10, 2025 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 10, 2025 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jan 28, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jan 17, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jan 11, 2025 · F-0694 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.

Why it matters: Improper IV care can cause infections, dehydration, or dangerous fluid imbalances.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jan 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 11, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 15, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Jan 9, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 6, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jul 10, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 10, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Jul 10, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
May 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 11, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Jan 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Oct 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Oct 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Nov 11, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202331J ▲
2024150E
2025126K ▲
202672J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

5 fines totaling $114,392.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 9, 2026Fine$52,088
Oct 6, 2025Fine$12,618
May 21, 2025Fine$19,630
Jan 11, 2025Fine$15,538
Oct 26, 2023Fine$14,518

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.463.463.95top 38% in Texas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.350.440.69bottom 40% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.943.043.50top 48% in Texas; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.340.48bottom 37% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)86.855.345.8bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)100.054.642.9bottom 8% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.06, RN 0.31, weekend 2.60. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Guadalupe County Hospital BoardOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2017
Blake, GaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/24/2023
Blake, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/24/2023
Blake, MalisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/24/2023
Blake, MalisaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/24/2023
Colvin, JimIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Gann, KodyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Gann, KodyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Georgetown I Enterprises, L.L.C.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/24/2023
Georgetown I Enterprises, L.L.C.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2025
Gutierrez, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2025
Huggins, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Humphrey, RonaldIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Lee, JamesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Major, DoloresIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Potter, SusanneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2025
Ramirez, LouisIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Reyes, JamesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Vordenbaum, EricIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Willig, ZacharyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Georgetown Nursing and Transitional Care3.2 miGeorgetown, TX★★★★☆4/5
Bel Air at Teravista6.8 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆2/5
San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center9.3 miRound Rock, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Trinity Care Center10.7 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Hearthstone Nursing and Rehabilitation11.2 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Park Valley Inn Health Center11.3 miRound Rock, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Falcon Ridge Rehabilitation11.3 miHutto, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
The Center at Parmer12.5 miAustin, TX★★★★★4/5
Ignite Medical Resort Round Rock, LLC12.9 miAustin, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
The Springs Healthcare and Rehabilitation13.1 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆3/5
Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center13.2 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆4/5
Sagebrook Nursing and Rehabilitation14.2 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Georgetown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675915.