Avir at Houston

2310 S Eldridge Pkwy, Houston, TX 77077 (opens Google Maps) · Harris County · (281) 558-3900· 148 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Oct 5, 2005 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: AVIR HEALTH GROUP (116 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 8, 2026

Serious findings on record

most recent May 8, 2026

$180,218

Fines, last 3 years

2.79

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 8, 2026 · F-0627 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.

Why it matters: A rushed or poorly planned move can leave a resident somewhere that can't meet their needs.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Dec 2, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Dec 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 20, 2024 · F-0695

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.

Corrected: Mar 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 20, 2024 · F-0726

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Corrected: Mar 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Nov 8, 2023 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Corrected: Nov 22, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Nov 8, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Corrected: Nov 22, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 41 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Jun 26, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint F-0655
Jun 26, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint F-0687
Jun 26, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint F-0849

View all 41 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 26, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655
Jun 26, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint · F-0687
Jun 26, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint · F-0849
Jun 18, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jun 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690
Jun 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
May 8, 2026	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627
May 8, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
May 8, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
May 8, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 8, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804
May 8, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Apr 15, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Apr 15, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695
Dec 2, 2025	▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627
Nov 19, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · from a complaint · F-0640
Nov 19, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690
Mar 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Mar 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694
Mar 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Mar 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
Mar 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638
Mar 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640
Mar 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Mar 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Mar 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Mar 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Mar 7, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Mar 7, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint · F-0687
Mar 7, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
Feb 20, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Feb 20, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726
Feb 20, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730
Feb 20, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Dec 7, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Nov 8, 2023	▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Nov 8, 2023	▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Sep 19, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 8).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	4	2	K ▲
2024	4	2	J ▲
2025	17	1	K ▲
2026	16	1	J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

4 fines totaling $180,218, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

Date	Type	Amount / length
May 8, 2026	Fine	$27,378
Nov 19, 2025	Fine	$124,099
Feb 20, 2024	Fine	$10,845
Feb 20, 2024	Payment Denial	3 days from Mar 20, 2024
Nov 8, 2023	Fine	$17,896

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityTexas averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

2.79

3.46

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.88

0.44

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.26

3.04

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Texas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.79	3.46	3.95	bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.88	0.44	0.69	top 4% in Texas; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.26	3.04	3.50	bottom 6% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.38	0.34	0.48	top 29% in Texas; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	—	55.3	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	—	54.6	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.79, RN 0.88, weekend 2.26.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.79 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Avir at Houston. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
2310 S Eldridge Pkwy Holdings LLC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
Graf Holdings LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
TX SNF Holdings II LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
TX SNF Holdings Member, LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
2310 S Eldridge Pkwy Property Owner LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
Dagan, Amitai	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/08/2025
Freund, Nochum	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
Goldberger, Abraham	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/08/2025
Goldberger, Faigy	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/08/2025
Green, Freddie	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
Nguyen, Charles	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
Travitsky, Aaron	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
Welltower INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025
Welltower Op, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/24/2025

All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Avir Health Group — 116 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Avir at Irving — Irving, TX · overall 5/5
Avir at Itasca — Itasca, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Jacksboro — Jacksboro, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Jacksonville — Jacksonville, TX · overall 5/5
Avir at Jefferson — Jefferson, TX · overall 2/5
Avir at Jeffrey Place — Waco, TX · overall 3/5
Avir at Johnson City — Johnson City, TX · overall 1/5
Avir at Kaufman — Kaufman, TX · overall 2/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 115 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
"How is routine foot care handled here, and does a podiatrist visit regularly?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Texas midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"The ownership record on file lists 15 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 72 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Continuing Care at Eagles Trace	1.0 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★☆	4/5
Parkway Place	1.4 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★★	3/5
Park Manor of Westchase	1.9 mi	Houston, TX	★★☆☆☆	1/5
West Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation	2.1 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★☆	4/5
Focused Care at Beechnut	3.8 mi	Houston, TX	★★☆☆☆	1/5
West Houston Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	4.2 mi	Houston, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
The Lev at Town Park	5.2 mi	Houston, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Focused Care at Westwood	5.5 mi	Houston, TX	★★★☆☆	3/5
Treemont Health Care Center	5.6 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★☆	3/5
Solera at West Houston	6.0 mi	Houston, TX	★★★☆☆	2/5
Ffiii Houston SNF Tenant LLC	6.5 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★☆	3/5
Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center	6.8 mi	Houston, TX	★☆☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Harris, TX — 97 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Avir at Orem — Houston, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Pasadena — Pasadena, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Veterans Memorial — Houston, TX · overall 1/5abuse
Bay Ridge Healthcare Center — La Porte, TX · overall 1/5
Bayou Manor — Houston, TX · overall 5/5
Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente — Pasadena, TX · overall 4/5
Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites — Houston, TX · overall 3/5
Brookdale Galleria — Houston, TX · overall 3/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Houston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676066.