TexasKaty

Falcon Point Post Acute

23553 West Fernhurst Drive, Katy, TX 77494 · Harris County · 130 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 2008

Part of chain: CROSS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$19,684
Fines, last 3 years
3.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Mar 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 27, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Jan 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jan 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
May 19, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340F
202430E
202580E
2026160E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $19,684.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 19, 2024Fine$19,684

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.473.463.95top 37% in Texas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.220.440.69bottom 12% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.953.043.50top 46% in Texas; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.340.48bottom 7% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.855.345.8bottom 35% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)78.654.642.9bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.22, RN 0.21, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
23553WFD, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
23553WFD, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Ali, NidaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Ali, NidaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Falcon Point Opco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Kilgore Family Trust-2012OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Kilgore, JoshuaIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2025
Ktfw-Tx LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Ktfw-Tx LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Martin, ChristopherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
McGuire, WesleyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Rankin, DerekIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2002
Ussery, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Ignite Medical Resort Katy, LLC0.9 miKaty, TX★★★★☆3/5
Sterling Oaks Rehabilitation1.8 miKaty, TX★★★★☆4/5
Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy2.3 miKaty, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Ka2.6 miKaty, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation2.8 miKaty, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Paradigm at Katy3.3 miKaty, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Solera at West Houston4.7 miHouston, TX★★★☆☆2/5
West Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation8.5 miHouston, TX★★★★☆4/5
Park Manor of Westchase8.6 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Parkway Place9.4 miHouston, TX★★★★★3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Katy →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676195.