TexasSan Angelo

Park Plaza Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

2210 N Howard St, San Angelo, TX 76901 · Tom Green County · 90 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 2003

Part of chain: CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE (149 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024180E
202540E
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.003.463.95
Registered Nurse hours0.000.440.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.003.043.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.340.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)85.055.345.8bottom 12% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)80.054.642.9bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ballinger Memorial Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/01/2024
Aguilar, RolandoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Atwood, MarkIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Blake, GaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Blake, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Blake, MalisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Bundrant, BradlyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Dankworth, MikeIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Fricke, RhettIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Fricke, RhettIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Huggins, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Hunt, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Hunter, WilliamIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Reasor, TylerIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
San Angelo I Enterprises, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
San Angelo I Enterprises, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Studer, ScottIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Willig, ZacharyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Zuniga, ElizabethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cedar Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center0.6 miSan Angelo, TX★★★★☆4/5
Avir at Meadow Creek3.5 miSan Angelo, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sagecrest Alzheimers Care Center3.5 miSan Angelo, TX★★★★★5/5
Avir at Arbor Terrace3.6 miSan Angelo, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Regency House3.9 miSan Angelo, TX★★★☆☆4/5
St. Juanita Retirement and Rehab4.0 miSan Angelo, TX—/5
Avir at San Angelo4.8 miSan Angelo, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in San Angelo →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675982.