How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Fairfield Village Rehabilitation
1203 North Fairfield Road, Layton, UT 84041 (opens Google Maps) · Davis County · (801) 807-0113· 40 certified beds · avg 32 residents/day · certified since Dec 2, 2010 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 28, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
View all 24 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| May 28, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| May 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · F-0800 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| May 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 16).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 16
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 16 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityUtah averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.41
Utah average: 3.87
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.66
Utah average: 1.17
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.08
Utah average: 3.39
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.41 | 3.87 | 3.95 | top 16% in Utah; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.66 | 1.17 | 0.69 | top 16% in Utah; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.08 | 3.39 | 3.50 | top 16% in Utah; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.38 | 0.88 | 0.48 | top 14% in Utah; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.2 | 50.7 | 45.8 | bottom 21% in Utah; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 73.3 | 40.6 | 42.9 | bottom 7% in Utah; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 1.90, weekend 4.68.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.06 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Fairfield Village Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Senior Living Corporation | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| CHP TRS Holding INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2014 |
| SSL Sparti LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| SSL Sparti Property Holdings INC. | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Bailey, Tabitha | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Bailey, Tabitha | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Bailey, Tabitha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Beus, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2015 |
| Beus, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2015 |
| Capital Senior Living Corporation | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Capital Senior Living Corporation | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Cober, Timothy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Detz, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Generations, L.L.C | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2014 |
| Herrick, Chad | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2022 |
| Herrick, Chad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2022 |
| Herrick, Chad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2022 |
| Langhorst, Jodi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2025 |
| Langhorst, Jodi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Levee, Kathleen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2020 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What happens if a resident is hungry between meals or misses a mealtime — what food options are available?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 63% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 16 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocky Mountain Care- Clearfield | 2.8 mi | Clearfield, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care Center | 3.7 mi | Clearfield, UT | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Pine View Transitional Rehab | 5.2 mi | South Ogden, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Mountain View Health Services | 5.5 mi | Ogden, UT | —/5 | SFF | |
| South Ogden Post-Acute (cascades at South Ogden) | 5.9 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Terrace Transitional | 6.3 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mt Ogden Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.3 mi | Washington Terrace, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Stonehenge of Ogden | 7.2 mi | Washington Terrace, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Heritage Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 7.8 mi | Roy, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Crestwood Rehabilitation and Nursing | 8.2 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Harrison Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 8.6 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Stonecreek | 13.1 mi | Bountiful, UT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Davis, UT — 6 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Monument Healthcare Bountiful — Bountiful, UT · overall 3/5
- South Davis Specialty Care — Bountiful, UT · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465174.