Fairfield Village Rehabilitation

Name: Fairfield Village Rehabilitation
Address: 1203 North Fairfield Road, Layton, UT, 84041, US
Telephone: 8018070113

1203 North Fairfield Road, Layton, UT 84041 · Davis County · 40 certified beds · avg 32 residents/day · certified since Dec 2, 2010

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.41

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
May 28, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
May 28, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 16).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2025	8	0	E
2026	16	0	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Utah avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.41	3.87	3.95	top 16% in Utah; top 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.66	1.17	0.69	top 16% in Utah; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.08	3.39	3.50	top 16% in Utah; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.38	0.88	0.48	top 14% in Utah; top 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	63.2	50.7	45.8	bottom 21% in Utah; bottom 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	73.3	40.6	42.9	bottom 7% in Utah; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 1.90, weekend 4.68. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Capital Senior Living Corporation	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
CHP TRS Holding INC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	10/01/2014
SSL Sparti LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
SSL Sparti Property Holdings INC.	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
Bailey, Tabitha	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
Bailey, Tabitha	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
Bailey, Tabitha	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
Beus, Michael	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015
Beus, Michael	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015
Capital Senior Living Corporation	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
Capital Senior Living Corporation	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
Cober, Timothy	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
Detz, Kevin	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/11/2026
Generations, L.L.C	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/20/2014
Herrick, Chad	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2022
Herrick, Chad	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2022
Herrick, Chad	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2022
Langhorst, Jodi	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/25/2025
Langhorst, Jodi	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2025
Levee, Kathleen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"What happens if a resident is hungry between meals or misses a mealtime — what food options are available?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Rocky Mountain Care- Clearfield	2.8 mi	Clearfield, UT	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care Center	3.7 mi	Clearfield, UT	★★★★★	3/5
Pine View Transitional Rehab	5.2 mi	South Ogden, UT	★★★★★	5/5
Mountain View Health Services	5.5 mi	Ogden, UT		—/5	SFF
South Ogden Post-Acute (cascades at South Ogden)	5.9 mi	Ogden, UT	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Terrace Transitional	6.3 mi	Ogden, UT	★★★☆☆	2/5
Mt Ogden Health and Rehabilitation Center	6.3 mi	Washington Terrace, UT	★★★★★	4/5
Stonehenge of Ogden	7.2 mi	Washington Terrace, UT	★★★★★	4/5
Heritage Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation	7.8 mi	Roy, UT	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Crestwood Rehabilitation and Nursing	8.2 mi	Ogden, UT	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Harrison Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation	8.6 mi	Ogden, UT	★★★★☆	3/5
Monument Healthcare Stonecreek	13.1 mi	Bountiful, UT	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Layton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465174.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Fairfield Village Rehabilitation

1203 North Fairfield Road, Layton, UT 84041 · 8018070113

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "What happens if a resident is hungry between meals or misses a mealtime — what food options are available?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
☐ "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 465174 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)