ConnecticutTrumbull

Maefair Center for Health & Rehabilitation

21 Maefair Court, Trumbull, CT 06611 · Greater Bridgeport County · 134 certified beds · avg 126 residents/day · certified since May 4, 1994

Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES (42 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$25,366
Fines, last 3 years
3.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 19, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 13, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 7, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 7, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jul 27, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 1, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 1, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 1, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jul 1, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 1, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150E
2023110D
202431J ▲
2025111J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $25,366.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 19, 2025Fine$17,345
Aug 15, 2024Fine$8,021

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.673.803.95bottom 48% in Connecticut; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.700.69bottom 47% in Connecticut; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.253.433.50bottom 43% in Connecticut; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.460.48bottom 23% in Connecticut; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.837.445.8top 26% in Connecticut; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.638.642.9top 30% in Connecticut; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.59, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ariella Ehrenfeld Investment LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
BG II Opco ML LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/10/2024
Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2024
David Ostreicher Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Dymer Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2024
Ehrenfeld, JacobIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Ehrenfeld, MindyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2024
Ej Capital Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Gelbtuch, JayIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
GM Equities LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Gray Family Investors LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Ilana Ostreicher Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2024
Juniper Capital Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2024
Levon Papa II LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Lopiansky, RebeccaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
LPKLR LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2024
Michelle Ostreicher Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Millstein, NechamaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Oak Management Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/10/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Civita Care Northbridge2.5 miBridgeport, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Mozaic Senior Life2.6 miBridgeport, CT★★☆☆☆1/5
Ludlowe Center for Health & Rehabilitation2.7 miFairfield, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Springs at 3030 Park, the2.9 miBridgeport, CT★★★★★5/5
Cambridge Health and Rehabilitation Center3.7 miFairfield, CT★★★☆☆4/5
Lord Chamberlain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.9 miStratford, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Lord Chamberlain Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Ce4.9 miStratford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Masonicare at Bishop Wicke Health & Rehabilitation6.0 miShelton, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Gardner Heights Health Care Center, INC6.2 miShelton, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Civita Care Center at Milford6.8 miMilford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes6.8 miShelton, CT★★☆☆☆3/5
Civita Care Center at West River7.2 miMilford, CT★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Trumbull →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075404.