ConnecticutFairfield

Cambridge Health and Rehabilitation Center

2428 Easton Tnpk, Fairfield, CT 06825 · Greater Bridgeport County · 160 certified beds · avg 144 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1989

Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES (42 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.02
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Jul 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 25, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jul 25, 2019B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jul 25, 2019B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201990E
202240E
202340D
2024130E
202540D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.023.803.95bottom 9% in Connecticut; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.700.69bottom 18% in Connecticut; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.683.433.50bottom 5% in Connecticut; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.460.48bottom 18% in Connecticut; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.237.445.8top 46% in Connecticut; top 25% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)68.238.642.9bottom 7% in Connecticut; bottom 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 0.54, weekend 3.33. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
BPB Ventures LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%08/02/2021
Cedar Hill NG TrustOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2025
Juniper NG TrustOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2025
Lopiansky, RebeccaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2025
Oak Drive NG TrustOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2025
Ostreicher, DavidIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2025
Ostreicher, MarcIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2025
Rolling Hill NG TrustOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2025
Steg, ShaynaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2025
The Harry and Helen Ostreicher Family Trust Fbo Agnes ZitterOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest18%01/01/2025
The Harry and Helen Ostreicher Family Trust Fbo Marvin OstreicherOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest18%01/01/2025
Zitter, AgnesIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest18%05/14/2025
Almeida, ElizabethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2008
Barry Bokow 2012 Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2012
Bokow, BarryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Bokow, BarryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Bokow, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2015
BPB Equity Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2012
BPB Ventures LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/03/2025
Cambridge Manor Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2000

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Springs at 3030 Park, the1.2 miBridgeport, CT★★★★★5/5
Mozaic Senior Life1.3 miBridgeport, CT★★☆☆☆1/5
Ludlowe Center for Health & Rehabilitation2.0 miFairfield, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Civita Care Northbridge2.0 miBridgeport, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Carolton Chronic & Convalescent Hospital INC3.6 miFairfield, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Maefair Center for Health & Rehabilitation3.7 miTrumbull, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Southport Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC4.3 miSouthport, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Lord Chamberlain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center8.1 miStratford, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Lord Chamberlain Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Ce8.1 miStratford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Civita Care Center at Milford9.2 miMilford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Masonicare at Bishop Wicke Health & Rehabilitation9.6 miShelton, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Norwalk9.7 miNorwalk, CT★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fairfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075323.