ConnecticutStorrs Mansfield

Mansfield Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation

100 Warren Circle, Storrs Mansfield, CT 06268 · Capitol County · 98 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Feb 16, 1994

Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES (42 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$24,460
Fines, last 3 years
3.46
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 4, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 25, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 10, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 11, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 23, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Apr 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jan 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Apr 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Apr 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 11, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Mar 12, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 12, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Mar 12, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Mar 12, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 12, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 12, 2020C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202060D
2023101G ▲
202430D
2025112G ▲
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $24,460.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 4, 2025Fine$11,190
Apr 10, 2025Fine$13,270

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.463.803.95bottom 36% in Connecticut; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.650.700.69top 43% in Connecticut; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.233.433.50bottom 41% in Connecticut; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.470.460.48top 36% in Connecticut; top 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.037.445.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.86, RN 0.72, weekend 3.61. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest28%08/01/2024
David Ostreicher Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Gilmartin, ThomasIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Ilana Ostreicher Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest14%08/01/2024
Juniper Capital Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest20%08/01/2024
Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest14%08/01/2024
Oak Management Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest20%08/01/2024
Ostreicher, DavidIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Ostreicher, IlanaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Ostreicher, MarcIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Ostreicher, MarvinIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Ostreicher, MichelleIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Shayna Steg Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Steg, ShaynaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Ysro TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest20%08/01/2024
Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
David Ostreicher Family TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
David Ostreicher Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Harris, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Vanderman Place5.5 miWillimantic, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Saint Josephs Living Center INC6.4 miWindham, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Douglas Manor7.6 miWindham, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Woodlake at Tolland10.0 miTolland, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Complete Care at Fox Hill10.5 miVernon, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Vernon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center12.4 miVernon, CT★★★★★5/5
Evergreen Center for Health & Rehabilitation14.6 miStafford Springs, CT★★★☆☆2/5
Pierce Memorial Baptist Home, INC.15.4 miBrooklyn, CT★★★★★4/5
Westside Care Center15.4 miManchester, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Marlborough Health & Rehabilitation Center15.4 miMarlborough, CT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Touchpoints at Manchester15.6 miManchester, CT★★★★☆4/5
Complete Care at Harrington Court15.7 miColchester, CT★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Storrs Mansfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075402.