ConnecticutBridgeport

Springs at 3030 Park, the

3030 Park Avenue, Bridgeport, CT 06604 · Greater Bridgeport County · 23 certified beds · avg 21 residents/day · certified since May 8, 2009

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,018
Fines, last 3 years
5.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 21, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 15, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 21, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360E
202421G ▲
202570D
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,018.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 21, 2024Fine$8,018

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.243.803.95top 7% in Connecticut; top 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.780.700.69top 3% in Connecticut; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.473.433.50top 9% in Connecticut; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.230.460.48top 3% in Connecticut; top 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.037.445.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.91, RN 2.01, weekend 5.05. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Barnes, DavidIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2016
Ct Watermark Operator LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2016
Ct Watermark Partners LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2016
CTW Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2016
Freshwater, DavidIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2016
TFG Holdings X LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/31/2019
Zarrilli, FrederickIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Keogh, NatashaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2012
Senior Living Hospitality Group LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Senior Living Hospitality Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2025
Zarrilli, FrederickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Zarrilli, FrederickIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Civita Care Northbridge0.9 miBridgeport, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Cambridge Health and Rehabilitation Center1.2 miFairfield, CT★★★☆☆4/5
Mozaic Senior Life1.2 miBridgeport, CT★★☆☆☆1/5
Ludlowe Center for Health & Rehabilitation2.2 miFairfield, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Maefair Center for Health & Rehabilitation2.9 miTrumbull, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Carolton Chronic & Convalescent Hospital INC4.4 miFairfield, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Southport Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC5.1 miSouthport, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Lord Chamberlain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center7.0 miStratford, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Lord Chamberlain Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Ce7.0 miStratford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Civita Care Center at Milford8.0 miMilford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Masonicare at Bishop Wicke Health & Rehabilitation8.6 miShelton, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Civita Care Center at West River8.8 miMilford, CT★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bridgeport →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075440.