Springs at 3030 Park, the
3030 Park Avenue, Bridgeport, CT 06604 · Greater Bridgeport County · 23 certified beds · avg 21 residents/day · certified since May 8, 2009
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 21, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jun 15, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (18)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jan 7, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint |
| Feb 27, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Feb 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Feb 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Feb 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $8,018.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Connecticut avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.24 | 3.80 | 3.95 | top 7% in Connecticut; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.78 | 0.70 | 0.69 | top 3% in Connecticut; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.47 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 9% in Connecticut; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.23 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 3% in Connecticut; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 0.0 | 37.4 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 38.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.91, RN 2.01, weekend 5.05. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2016 |
| Ct Watermark Operator LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/01/2016 |
| Ct Watermark Partners LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2016 |
| CTW Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2016 |
| Freshwater, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2016 |
| TFG Holdings X LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2019 |
| Zarrilli, Frederick | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Keogh, Natasha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/05/2012 |
| Senior Living Hospitality Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Senior Living Hospitality Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2025 |
| Zarrilli, Frederick | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Zarrilli, Frederick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do residents get routine dental care, and what happens if someone has a dental emergency at night?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civita Care Northbridge | 0.9 mi | Bridgeport, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Cambridge Health and Rehabilitation Center | 1.2 mi | Fairfield, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mozaic Senior Life | 1.2 mi | Bridgeport, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ludlowe Center for Health & Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | Fairfield, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Maefair Center for Health & Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | Trumbull, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Carolton Chronic & Convalescent Hospital INC | 4.4 mi | Fairfield, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Southport Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC | 5.1 mi | Southport, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lord Chamberlain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 7.0 mi | Stratford, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lord Chamberlain Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Ce | 7.0 mi | Stratford, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Civita Care Center at Milford | 8.0 mi | Milford, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Masonicare at Bishop Wicke Health & Rehabilitation | 8.6 mi | Shelton, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Civita Care Center at West River | 8.8 mi | Milford, CT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Bridgeport →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075440.