New HampshireLebanon

Lebanon Center, Genesis Healthcare

24 Old Etna Road, Lebanon, NH 03766 · Grafton County · 110 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1995

SFF Candidate

Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$72,924
Fines, last 3 years
3.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Oct 6, 2025 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Oct 31, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 6, 2025▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Aug 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Aug 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have policies on smoking.
Aug 14, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint
Jul 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · from a complaint
Jul 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jul 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Jul 11, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Jul 11, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jul 11, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jul 11, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Jul 11, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Apr 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Apr 19, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 19, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370D
2024130E
2025101L ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $72,924.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 14, 2025Fine$72,924

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Hampshire avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.184.113.95bottom 21% in New Hampshire; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.520.820.69bottom 11% in New Hampshire; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.863.673.50bottom 28% in New Hampshire; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.550.48bottom 13% in New Hampshire; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.644.145.8bottom 26% in New Hampshire; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)46.740.942.9bottom 32% in New Hampshire; bottom 41% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.17, RN 0.52, weekend 2.86. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Gen Operations I LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Gen Operations II LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Genesis Healthcare INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Genesis Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Genesis Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Genesis NH Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2011
Genesis Operations LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
GHC Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Sun Healthcare Group INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Whitman, ArnoldIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/31/2011
Berg, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2012
Bridgeford, LauraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Genesis Operations LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Mendelson, AviIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Vance, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/12/2023
Vance, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/12/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hanover Terrace Health and Rehabilitation4.5 miHanover, NH★★★★☆3/5
Cedar Hill Health Care Center17.0 miWindsor, VT★★★☆☆4/5
Elm Wood Center at Claremont18.9 miClaremont, NH★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lebanon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 305050.