How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Landmark of Baton Rouge
9105 Oxford Place Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 (opens Google Maps) · E. Baton Rouge County · (225) 293-1003· 144 certified beds · avg 120 residents/day · certified since Jun 2, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 25, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint · F-0676 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityLouisiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.43
Louisiana average: 4.04
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.35
Louisiana average: 0.32
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.48
Louisiana average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.43 | 4.04 | 3.95 | top 27% in Louisiana; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 26% in Louisiana; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.48 | 3.45 | 3.50 | top 45% in Louisiana; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.48 | top 29% in Louisiana; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.8 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 22% in Louisiana; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 12.5 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 9% in Louisiana; top 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.75, RN 0.29, weekend 2.95.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.75 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Landmark of Baton Rouge. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medico LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/23/2001 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Albin, Ronald | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2021 |
| Albin, Ronald | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2021 |
| Alisons 2016 Fam Tr No 2 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Aria Care Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Beebe 2013 Childrens Tr NG | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2021 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2021 |
| Beebe, Elton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2007 |
| Felicias 2016 Fam Tr No 2 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Kling, Kayla | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/26/2022 |
| Landmark of Baton Rouge LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Louisiana Extended Care Centers LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| LTC Him Consulting INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2006 |
| Medico LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2001 |
| Parkinson, Toni | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/15/2015 |
Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Beebe Family — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Landmark of Lake Charles — Lake Charles, LA · overall 3/5
- Landmark of Plaquemine — Plaquemine, LA · overall 4/5
- Landmark of Rayne — Rayne, LA · overall 3/5
- Landmark South Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 4/5
- Lexington House — Alexandria, LA · overall 1/5
- Matthews Memorial Health Care Center — Alexandria, LA · overall 2/5
- Riverview Care Center — Bossier City, LA · overall 1/5
- Senior Village Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Opelousas, LA · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 58% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 36 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 30 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II | 0.0 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Jefferson Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC | 0.7 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| White Oak Post Acute Care | 1.6 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Ollie Steele Burden Manor | 1.6 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Center Point Health Care and Rehab | 1.8 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Guest House Care Center | 2.7 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center | 3.1 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Woodleigh of Baton Rouge | 3.8 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pines Retirement Center of Baton Rouge | 4.1 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Flannery Oaks Guest House | 4.2 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Baton Rouge General Medical Center, SNF | 4.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in E. Baton Rouge, LA — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Landmark South Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 4/5
- Mid City Community Nursing and Rehab — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 4/5
- Old Jefferson Community Care Center — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 5/5
- River Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC — Baker, LA · overall 3/5abuse
- St James Place Nursing Care Center — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195494.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).