North CarolinaWilmington

Northchase Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

3015 Enterprise Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 · New Hanover County · 140 certified beds · avg 128 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1979

Part of chain: PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE (40 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$7,901
Fines, last 3 years
3.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 3, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 2, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jun 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jun 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Jun 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 3, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340F
2024151G ▲
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $7,901.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 3, 2024Fine$7,901

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.624.013.95bottom 46% in North Carolina; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.790.640.69top 20% in North Carolina; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.313.563.50top 46% in North Carolina; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.600.410.48top 16% in North Carolina; top 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.849.045.8top 28% in North Carolina; top 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)15.845.742.9top 9% in North Carolina; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.49, RN 0.76, weekend 3.19. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boice, GaleIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2018
Boice, GaleIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2025
Boice, GaleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2018
Hill, RaymondIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Hill, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Hill, StephenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Johnson, DianneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Principle Long Term Care, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Revis, SarahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/23/2020
Revis, SarahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Seder, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/02/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Davis Health and Wellness Center at Cambridge Vill3.4 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Liberty Commons Rehabilitation Center4.5 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Bradley Creek Health Center5.0 miWilmington, NC★★★★★5/5
Davis Health Care Center6.0 miWilmington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center7.3 miWilmington, NC★★★★★5/5
Peak Resources-Wilmington, INC8.3 miWilmington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
August Healthcare at Wilmington8.4 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Azalea Health & Rehab Center9.3 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Brunswick Cove Nursing Center10.7 miWinnabow, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Trinity Grove11.3 miWilmington, NC★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove12.3 miWilmington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Woodbury Wellness Center INC14.5 miHampstead, NC★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Wilmington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345119.