MinnesotaLa Crescent

La Crescent Health Services

101 South Hill Street, La Crescent, MN 55947 · Houston County · 42 certified beds · avg 30 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1986 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE (59 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 14, 2026 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 19, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 14, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 14, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not designate a physician to serve as medical director — the doctor responsible for overseeing resident care policies and coordinating medical care across the facility.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents.
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Apr 14, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Feb 6, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Dec 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 22).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
202520F
2026221J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.884.833.95bottom 11% in Minnesota; top 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.381.220.69top 27% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.394.273.50bottom 8% in Minnesota; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.930.690.48top 19% in Minnesota; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.442.245.8bottom 31% in Minnesota; bottom 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.038.642.9bottom 32% in Minnesota; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.86, RN 1.38, weekend 3.37. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Baumann, TroyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2017
Hoehn, JeffreyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2017
NSHC Wisconsin LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/28/2016
Baumann, TroyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2016
Baumann, TroyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2016
Baumann, TroyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2016
Belongia, ChristinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Belongia, ChristinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/22/2018
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Continuum Therapy Partners LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Continuum Therapy Partners LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Franta, PeterIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Franta, PeterIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Gee, DarrenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Gee, DarrenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
GPH la Cresent LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2017
Greer, LaurenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Riverside4.4 miLa Crosse, WI★★★★☆4/5
Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse5.2 miLa Crosse, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Bethany St Joseph Care Ctr6.2 miLa Crosse, WI★★★★☆3/5
Onalaska Care Center6.2 miOnalaska, WI★★★★★5/5
Hillview Health Care Ctr6.3 miLa Crosse, WI★★★★★4/5
Mulder Health Care Facility12.7 miWest Salem, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lakeview Health Center13.1 miWest Salem, WI★★★★★4/5
Valley View Healthcare & Rehab13.3 miHouston, MN★★★★★4/5
Marinuka Manor18.3 miGalesville, WI★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in La Crescent →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245319.