MinnesotaSt Charles

Whitewater Health Services

525 Bluff Avenue, St Charles, MN 55972 · Winona County · 45 certified beds · avg 32 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE (59 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$16,452
Fines, last 3 years
3.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 6, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jul 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jul 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jun 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 14, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Aug 6, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202421J ▲
202590E
2026100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $16,452.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 6, 2024Fine$16,452

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.974.833.95bottom 14% in Minnesota; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.121.220.69bottom 49% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.684.273.50bottom 23% in Minnesota; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.580.690.48bottom 49% in Minnesota; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)22.742.245.8top 6% in Minnesota; top 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.038.642.9bottom 45% in Minnesota; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 1.00, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Baumann, TroyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2016
Hoehn, JeffreyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2016
NSHC Wisconsin LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/30/2016
Baumann, TroyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2016
Baumann, TroyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2016
Baumann, TroyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2016
Belongia, ChristinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Belongia, ChristinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/22/2018
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Continuum Therapy Partners LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Continuum Therapy Partners LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Gee, DarrenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Gee, DarrenIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2025
Gee, DarrenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2021
Gimlin, LindsayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/08/2025
Gimlin, LindsayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2025
GPH St. Charles LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Chosen Valley Care Center10.8 miChatfield, MN★★★★★5/5
The Green Prairie Rehabilitation Center14.6 miPlainview, MN★★★★★4/5
Good Shepherd Lutheran Home19.3 miRushford, MN★★★★★5/5
Sauer Health Care19.5 miWinona, MN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Rochester Restorative Care Center19.8 miRochester, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in St Charles →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245270.