How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Harborview Post Acute
1513 N 2nd Street, Memphis, TN 38107 (opens Google Maps) · Shelby County · (901) 272-2494· 113 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP (32 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 10, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Oct 27, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.38
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 27, 2025 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 27, 2025 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint F-0726
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 27, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| May 21, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| May 21, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTennessee averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.38
Tennessee average: 3.62
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.48
Tennessee average: 0.57
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.87
Tennessee average: 3.15
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Tennessee avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.38 | 3.62 | 3.95 | bottom 41% in Tennessee; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.69 | bottom 45% in Tennessee; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.87 | 3.15 | 3.50 | bottom 39% in Tennessee; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.20 | 0.39 | 0.48 | bottom 13% in Tennessee; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 48.9 | 45.8 | top 50% in Tennessee; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.4 | 43.2 | 42.9 | top 37% in Tennessee; top 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.78, RN 0.54, weekend 3.21.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.78 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Harborview Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clawson, Scott | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Earl, Steven | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Sanofsky, Jack | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| 1513 N 2nd Street TN LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| 1513 N 2nd Street TN LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2025 |
| Bullick, Craig | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Bullick, Craig | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Links Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Links Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2025 |
| Moughrabieh, Mohamad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2024 |
| Moughrabieh, Mohamad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2025 |
| Rodriguez, Curtis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2024 |
| Tilford, Toby | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Links Healthcare Group — 32 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Northbrooke Post Acute — Jackson, TN · overall 1/5
- Shelby Oaks Post Acute — Memphis, TN · overall 1/5abuse
- West Tennessee Post Acute — Jackson, TN · overall 4/5
- Avondale Villa Post-Acute — Livermore, CA · overall 4/5
- Baywood Post Acute — Campbell, CA · overall 3/5
- Beach Creek Post-Acute — Anaheim, CA · overall 3/5
- Canyon Creek Post-Acute — Castro Valley, CA · overall 4/5
- Clearwater Healthcare Center — Stockton, CA · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 31 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Tennessee midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 50% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 28 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midtown Center for Health and Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | Memphis, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Majestic Gardens at Memphis Rehab & SNC | 2.9 mi | Memphis, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Allen Morgan Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.0 mi | Memphis, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.0 mi | Memphis, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare of Memphis | 6.0 mi | Memphis, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Ave Maria Home | 6.0 mi | Bartlett, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Shelby Oaks Post Acute | 8.0 mi | Memphis, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Parkway Health and Rehabilitation Center | 8.7 mi | Memphis, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Graceland Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center | 9.2 mi | Memphis, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| The Springs Broadway | 9.3 mi | West Memphis, AR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Springs of Avalon | 9.6 mi | West Memphis, AR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Delta Blues Health & Rehabilitation | 10.1 mi | Memphis, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Shelby, TN — 25 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Kirby Pines Manor — Memphis, TN · overall 5/5
- Memphis Jewish Home — Cordova, TN · overall 4/5
- Millington Healthcare Center — Millington, TN · overall 2/5
- Quince Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Memphis, TN · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445428.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).