TennesseeCordova

Memphis Jewish Home

36 Bazeberry Road, Cordova, TN 38018 · Shelby County · 160 certified beds · avg 137 residents/day · certified since Jul 2, 1992

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.96
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 25, 2022 · F-0880

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Apr 17, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Nov 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 25, 2022▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Mar 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202271K ▲
202440D
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTennessee avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.963.623.95top 7% in Tennessee; top 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.940.570.69top 8% in Tennessee; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.363.153.50top 7% in Tennessee; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.840.390.48top 4% in Tennessee; top 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)56.148.945.8bottom 28% in Tennessee; bottom 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.543.242.9top 36% in Tennessee; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.66, RN 1.07, weekend 4.98. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Meadows, BobbyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cordova Wellness and Rehabilitation Center0.0 miCordova, TN★★★☆☆3/5
Applingwood Post Acute0.0 miCordova, TN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Village at Germantown4.3 miGermantown, TN★★☆☆☆1/5
The Kings Daughters and Sons5.1 miBartlett, TN★★☆☆☆2/5
Rainbow Rehab and Healthcare5.1 miBartlett, TN★★☆☆☆2/5
Signature Healthcare of Primacy6.3 miMemphis, TN★★★★★4/5
Quince Nursing and Rehabilitation Center6.3 miMemphis, TN★★☆☆☆1/5
Waters of Memphis a Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr6.3 miMemphis, TN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Collierville Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC7.3 miCollierville, TN★★☆☆☆3/5
The Suites at Jordan River7.3 miCollierville, TN★★★☆☆4/5
Kirby Pines Manor8.2 miMemphis, TN★★★★★5/5
Spring Gate Rehab & Healthcare Center8.3 miMemphis, TN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cordova →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445293.