WisconsinGlenwood City

Glenhaven

612 E Oak St, Glenwood City, WI 54013 · St. Croix County · 44 certified beds · avg 28 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: HEALTH DIMENSIONS GROUP (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 5, 2026 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 3, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 5, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 5, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 5, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Aug 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Dec 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Nov 30, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Nov 30, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 30, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360F
202490F
202550D
2026131G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.594.293.95top 10% in Wisconsin; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.591.010.69top 10% in Wisconsin; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.063.843.50top 9% in Wisconsin; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.920.680.48top 16% in Wisconsin; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.846.945.8bottom 29% in Wisconsin; bottom 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.039.742.9top 24% in Wisconsin; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.65, RN 1.32, weekend 4.21. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Field, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Field, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2022
Glenhaven, INC.Organization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1966
Glenhaven, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1966
Glenhaven, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1966
Larson, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2024
Larson, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2024
Larson, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2024
McCutchin, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1991
McCutchin, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2011
McCutchin, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2011
Moe, SamanthaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2017
Moe, SamanthaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2017
Moe, SamanthaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/31/2017
Nelson, LesleyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2010
Nelson, LesleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2010
Ramey, PaulIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2024
Ramey, PaulIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2024
Tuttle, CyndyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/04/2018
Tuttle, CyndyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/04/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Park View Home9.5 miWoodville, WI★★★★★4/5
Baldwin Care Center12.3 miBaldwin, WI★★★★☆3/5
Hammond Health Services14.3 miHammond, WI★★★★★5/5
Spring Valley Health and Rehab Center16.3 miSpring Valley, WI★☆☆☆☆2/5
American Lutheran Home-Menomonie16.3 miMenomonie, WI★★★★★5/5
Neighbors - Central Neighborhood (the)17.8 miMenomonie, WI★★★★☆3/5
Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the)17.9 miMenomonie, WI★★★★★4/5
Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the)17.9 miMenomonie, WI★★★★★5/5
Deerfield Care Center, LLC19.4 miNew Richmond, WI★★★★★4/5
Golden Age Manor19.5 miAmery, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Willow Ridge Healthcare19.6 miAmery, WI★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Glenwood City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525602.