Minnesota ›Frazee

Frazee Care Center

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

219 West Maple Avenue, Frazee, MN 56544 (opens Google Maps) · Becker County · (218) 334-4501· 42 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: HEALTH DIMENSIONS GROUP (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 7, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. F-0570

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641

View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. · F-0570
Nov 6, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Nov 6, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Nov 6, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791
Feb 13, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851
Feb 13, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583
Feb 13, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658
Feb 13, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Feb 13, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 13, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Feb 13, 2024C · Potential for minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · from a complaint · F-0577
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024110F
202610E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMinnesota averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.97
Minnesota average: 4.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.94
Minnesota average: 1.22
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.34
Minnesota average: 4.27
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.974.833.95bottom 14% in Minnesota; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.941.220.69bottom 27% in Minnesota; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.344.273.50bottom 7% in Minnesota; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.690.48bottom 19% in Minnesota; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.842.245.8top 41% in Minnesota; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.538.642.9bottom 36% in Minnesota; bottom 43% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.33, RN 1.03, weekend 3.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.33 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Frazee Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Legacy Senior ServicesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/23/2007
Anderson, MollyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Anderson, MollyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Beck, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2013
Birky, AlexisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2013
Birky, AlexisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2013
First Resource BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2007
First Resource BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2007
Green, RogerIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2007
Green, RogerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2007
HDG Real Estate, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/07/2020
HDG Real Estate, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/07/2020
Health Dimensions Consulting INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2007
Jensen, JoelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/07/2013
Krejci, PatrickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Krejci, PatrickIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Lunde, EricIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2007
Lunde, EricIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2007
Paitich, NadineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2022
Schmidt, KellyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2019

All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Health Dimensions Group — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How is residents' personal money protected and tracked, and how can families review the account statements?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
  • "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
  • "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
  • "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
  • "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Minnesota midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 37% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 20 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Emmanuel Nursing Home8.3 miDetroit Lakes, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Essentia Health Oak Crossing8.9 miDetroit Lakes, MN★★★★★4/5
Perham Living10.7 miPerham, MN★★★★★5/5
Sunnyside Care Center19.5 miLake Park, MN★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Frazee →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245299.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details