WisconsinSpring Valley

Spring Valley Health and Rehab Center

S830 - Westland Dr, Spring Valley, WI 54767 · Pierce County · 40 certified beds · avg 36 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1990

Part of chain: HEALTH DIMENSIONS GROUP (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$27,690
Fines, last 3 years
4.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 25, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 2, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 1, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Aug 8, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 25, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · from a complaint
Jun 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jun 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jun 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
2024152J ▲
2025140F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $27,690.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 1, 2024Fine$12,048
Apr 25, 2024Fine$15,642

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.444.293.95top 38% in Wisconsin; top 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.731.010.69bottom 27% in Wisconsin; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.913.843.50top 39% in Wisconsin; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.530.680.48bottom 38% in Wisconsin; top 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.446.945.8bottom 13% in Wisconsin; bottom 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)83.339.742.9bottom 2% in Wisconsin; bottom 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.99, RN 0.66, weekend 3.52. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Government - City/county

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Village of Spring ValleyOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/15/2019
Bremer Bank National AssociationOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2019
Briscoe, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Briscoe, PatriciaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Emerson, LuannIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/20/2015
Emerson, LuannIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/20/2015
Erickson, ElizabethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/20/2021
Field, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/10/2025
Field, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/10/2025
Health Dimensions Consulting INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Health Dimensions Consulting INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Hennessey, ErinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Huepfel, MatthewIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/19/1994
Koch, TheresaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/18/2023
Koch, TheresaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
Lukes, RuthIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/20/2021
O'Connell, RichardIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2009
Pelz, NathanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
Rogotzke, AmberIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Shvetzoff, SergeiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Park View Home8.3 miWoodville, WI★★★★★4/5
Baldwin Care Center9.8 miBaldwin, WI★★★★☆3/5
Ellsworth Health Services12.5 miEllsworth, WI★★★★★5/5
Hammond Health Services12.9 miHammond, WI★★★★★5/5
Plum City Care Ctr15.0 miPlum City, WI★★★★★4/5
Glenhaven16.3 miGlenwood City, WI★★★☆☆2/5
Kinnic Health and Rehabilitation Center16.5 miRiver Falls, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
American Lutheran Home-Menomonie17.7 miMenomonie, WI★★★★★5/5
Neighbors - Central Neighborhood (the)18.9 miMenomonie, WI★★★★☆3/5
Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the)19.0 miMenomonie, WI★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Spring Valley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525466.