Future Care Cherrywood

12020 Reisterstown Road, Reisterstown, MD 21136 (opens Google Maps) · Baltimore County · (410) 833-3801· 151 certified beds · avg 159 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Oct 1, 2025

Serious findings on record

most recent Jan 28, 2019

Fines, last 3 years

3.87

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jan 28, 2019 · F-0609

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Mar 14, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 66 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint F-0655
Oct 1, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
Oct 1, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550

View all 66 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 14, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655
Oct 1, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · F-0551
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · F-0627
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care. · F-0675
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · F-0839
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Oct 1, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jun 6, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Jun 6, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jun 6, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · F-0624
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Jun 6, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943
Jan 28, 2019	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Jan 28, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jan 28, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jan 28, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Jan 28, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676
Jan 28, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed. · F-0914
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide at least one adequately sized room for dining and activities, with good lighting, airflow, and furniture. · F-0920
Jan 28, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (27 → 11).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2019

2023

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2019	27	1	J ▲
2023	27	0	F
2025	11	0	E
2026	1	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.87

3.83

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

1.07

0.83

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

3.43

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.87	3.83	3.95	top 32% in Maryland; top 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.07	0.83	0.69	top 17% in Maryland; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.43	3.43	3.50	top 34% in Maryland; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.95	0.63	0.48	top 13% in Maryland; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	53.3	40.2	45.8	bottom 14% in Maryland; bottom 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	47.9	38.7	42.9	bottom 27% in Maryland; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.85, RN 1.07, weekend 3.42.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Future Care Cherrywood. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Attman, Jeffrey	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1989
Attman, Leonard	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1989
Jeffrey Attmon Trust Ua DTD 122686 Attmon Phyllis Ttee	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	06/01/1988
Leonard J Attman Tr Ua Fbo Wende Attman Phyllis Ttee	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	06/01/1988
Shellye Attman Gilden Tr Ua DTD Attman Phyllis Ttee	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	06/01/1988
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Attman, Gary	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Gary	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Gary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Jeffrey	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Leonard	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Attman, Leonard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Bent Nursing Home INC	Organization	General Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1989
Bent Real Estate Limited Partnership	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/1988
Finglass, Brian	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Finglass, Brian	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007
Finglass, Brian	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2007

Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Future Care/Lifebridge Health — 18 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Future Care Chesapeake — Arnold, MD · overall 5/5
Future Care Cold Spring — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5
Future Care Homewood — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5
Future Care Irvington — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5
Future Care Northpoint — Baltimore, MD · overall 5/5
Future Care Old Court — Randallstown, MD · overall 5/5
Future Care Pineview — Clinton, MD · overall 3/5
Future Care Sandtown-Winchester — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 17 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"How do you involve a resident's representative in care decisions, and how quickly are they consulted?"
"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 53% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 33 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 83 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Chapel Hill Nursing Center	4.4 mi	Randallstown, MD	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
North Oaks Communities	5.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	5/5
Patapsco Healthcare	5.5 mi	Randallstown, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Future Care Old Court	6.6 mi	Randallstown, MD	★★★★★	5/5
Courtland, LLC	7.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Pikesville	7.3 mi	Pikesville, MD	★★☆☆☆	1/5
King David Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	8.1 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Lorien Mays Chapel	8.3 mi	Timonium, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Resorts of Augsburg	8.6 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Advanced Rehab at Autumn Lake Healthcare	8.7 mi	Lutherville, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
Maryland Masonic Homes LTD	8.9 mi	Cockeysville, MD	★★★☆☆	2/5
Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC	9.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Baltimore, MD — 43 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Future Care Northpoint — Baltimore, MD · overall 5/5
Glen Meadows Retirement Com. — Glen Arm, MD · overall 4/5
Holly Hill Healthcare Center — Towson, MD · overall 2/5abuse
Little Sisters of the Poor — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Reisterstown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215192.