MissouriCape Girardeau

Fountainbleau Lodge

2001 North Kingshighway, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 · Cape Girardeau County · 33 certified beds · avg 28 residents/day · certified since Aug 11, 1989

Part of chain: SHAFIQ MALIK (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,827
Fines, last 3 years
5.46
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 18, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 9, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 8, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Jun 18, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Mar 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Mar 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Mar 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Mar 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Mar 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390F
202481J ▲
202530F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,827.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 18, 2024Fine$8,827

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.463.663.95top 5% in Missouri; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.100.490.69top 3% in Missouri; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.453.223.50top 8% in Missouri; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.720.330.48top 3% in Missouri; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.756.045.8top 30% in Missouri; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9top 1% in Missouri; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.99, RN 1.01, weekend 4.07. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chaudhry, BilkessIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12%11/25/1985
Malik, AliIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%11/25/1985
Malik, Muhammad TariqIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12%11/25/1985
Naeem, TahiraIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12%11/25/1985
Chaudhry, BilkessIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/25/1985
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2020
King, ReginaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2024
King, ReginaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/03/2025
Malik, AliIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/25/1985
Malik, ShafiqIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/25/1985
Malik, ShafiqIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/29/1989
Malik, ShafiqIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/25/1985
Sahai, MadhuIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/13/2025
Sahai, MadhuIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/03/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heartland Care and Rehabilitation Center1.1 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★☆5/5
Chateau Girardeau2.1 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Life Care Center of Cape Girardeau2.9 miCape Girardeau, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lutheran Home, the3.1 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★★5/5
Ratliff Care Center3.4 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Hubble Creek4.2 miJackson, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Jackson Manor7.2 miJackson, MO★★★★☆5/5
Chaffee Nursing Center11.3 miChaffee, MO★★★★★5/5
Stonebridge Marble Hill14.4 miMarble Hill, MO★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cape Girardeau →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265383.