MissouriFarmington

Community Manor

783 Weber Road, Farmington, MO 63640 · St. Francois County · 99 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since May 26, 2005

Part of chain: SHAFIQ MALIK (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.82
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 6, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jun 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 21, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Apr 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380F
202490F
2025110D
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.823.663.95bottom 18% in Missouri; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.360.490.69bottom 40% in Missouri; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.353.223.50bottom 16% in Missouri; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.330.48top 49% in Missouri; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.356.045.8bottom 45% in Missouri; bottom 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)66.747.842.9bottom 26% in Missouri; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.91, RN 0.38, weekend 2.43. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Malik, OmerIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Malik, ShafiqIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Malik, OmerIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Malik, OmerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Malik, OmerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Malik, OmerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Malik, ShafiqIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Malik, ShafiqIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Malik, ShafiqIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Malik, ShafiqIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2018
Parks, LoraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Parks, LoraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Camelot Nursing and Rehabilitation Center0.3 miFarmington, MO★★★★★5/5
Southbrook Nursing Center0.8 miFarmington, MO★★★★★5/5
Farmington Presbyterian Manor1.0 miFarmington, MO★★★★★5/5
St Francois Manor2.7 miFarmington, MO★★★★☆4/5
Country Meadows6.0 miPark Hills, MO★★★★★5/5
NHC Healthcare, Desloge6.9 miDesloge, MO★★★★☆4/5
St Joe Manor10.6 miBonne Terre, MO★☆☆☆☆3/5
Baptist Homes of Arcadia Valley17.3 miIronton, MO—/5
Madison Medical Center17.8 miFredericktown, MO★★★★★4/5
Claru Deville Nursing Center18.1 miFredericktown, MO★★★☆☆2/5
Belleview Valley Nursing Home19.0 miBelleview, MO—/5SFF
Baisch Nursing Center19.8 miDe Soto, MO★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Farmington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265798.