MissouriCape Girardeau

Chateau Girardeau

3120 Independence Street, Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 · Cape Girardeau County · 75 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 1982

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Nov 16, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350E
202570D
202680D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.053.663.95top 31% in Missouri; top 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.490.69top 23% in Missouri; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.363.223.50top 40% in Missouri; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.290.330.48top 44% in Missouri; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)65.756.045.8bottom 25% in Missouri; bottom 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)70.047.842.9bottom 19% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.26, RN 0.63, weekend 3.53. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cape Retirement Community, INC.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/20/2009
Boeller, KeithIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Boeller, KeithIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Boeller, KeithIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Boeller, KeithIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Boeller, KeithIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Cape Retirement Community, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2009
Carins, PaulIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Edmonds, ChrisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Eudy, DebraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Fadler, JeannetteIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Herbst, CharlieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Kasten, VernonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2015
Kinder, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2016
Klein, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Mattingly, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Reeves, DeanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Schade, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Sides, ChrisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Tanner, RogerIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Life Care Center of Cape Girardeau0.9 miCape Girardeau, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lutheran Home, the1.0 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★★5/5
Fountainbleau Lodge2.1 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★★4/5
Ratliff Care Center2.4 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Heartland Care and Rehabilitation Center2.9 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★☆5/5
Hubble Creek5.9 miJackson, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Jackson Manor8.9 miJackson, MO★★★★☆5/5
Chaffee Nursing Center9.9 miChaffee, MO★★★★★5/5
Stonebridge Marble Hill15.3 miMarble Hill, MO★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cape Girardeau →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265142.