MissouriMarble Hill

Stonebridge Marble Hill

702 Highway 34 West, Marble Hill, MO 63764 · Bollinger County · 98 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since Oct 21, 1993

Part of chain: STONEBRIDGE SENIOR LIVING (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.20
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Feb 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360E
202480D
202660D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.203.663.95bottom 31% in Missouri; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.490.69top 40% in Missouri; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.803.223.50bottom 31% in Missouri; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.330.48top 31% in Missouri; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.156.045.8top 4% in Missouri; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.247.842.9top 17% in Missouri; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.48, weekend 2.90. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lierman, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2021
Bridge Rehabilitation INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Bridge Rehabilitation INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Cook, KellieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2011
Doerhoff, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Doerhoff, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Eldercare Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/29/1999
Eldercare Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Ellis, ReneeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Ellis, ReneeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Enterprise Bank & TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/30/2008
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2016
Jansen, AbbeyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2024
Jansen, AbbeyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2024
Lierman Family Partnership IIOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1999
Lierman, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Lierman, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Lierman, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Miller, BethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/17/2023
Palen, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Jackson Manor8.8 miJackson, MO★★★★☆5/5
Hubble Creek10.9 miJackson, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Fountainbleau Lodge14.4 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★★4/5
Heartland Care and Rehabilitation Center14.9 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★☆5/5
Chaffee Nursing Center15.1 miChaffee, MO★★★★★5/5
Chateau Girardeau15.3 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Lutheran Home, the15.9 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Cape Girardeau16.2 miCape Girardeau, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Ratliff Care Center17.6 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Aspire Senior Living Advance18.0 miAdvance, MO★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Marble Hill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265553.