MissouriJackson

Jackson Manor

710 Broadridge, Jackson, MO 63755 · Cape Girardeau County · 90 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1990

Part of chain: MGM HEALTHCARE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.78
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 11, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jul 11, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Apr 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
202480E
202550D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.783.663.95bottom 16% in Missouri; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.480.490.69top 38% in Missouri; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.253.223.50bottom 14% in Missouri; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.330.48top 22% in Missouri; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.356.045.8bottom 28% in Missouri; bottom 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.147.842.9bottom 37% in Missouri; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.35, RN 0.57, weekend 2.71. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Jackson Manor Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%02/01/2023
NDF Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%02/01/2023
Bienstock, JudahIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Hanners, CherylIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hubble Creek3.0 miJackson, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Fountainbleau Lodge7.2 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★★4/5
Heartland Care and Rehabilitation Center7.2 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★☆5/5
Stonebridge Marble Hill8.8 miMarble Hill, MO★★★★☆4/5
Chateau Girardeau8.9 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Lutheran Home, the9.8 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Cape Girardeau9.8 miCape Girardeau, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Ratliff Care Center10.5 miCape Girardeau, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Chaffee Nursing Center14.3 miChaffee, MO★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Jackson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265438.