Beautiful Savior Home
1003 South Cedar Street, Belton, MO 64012 · Cass County · 126 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Apr 26, 2004
Part of chain: SHAFIQ MALIK (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · from a complaint |
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| May 5, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| May 5, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| May 5, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| May 5, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jun 21, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 9).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.50 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in Missouri; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.69 | bottom 32% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.15 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 49% in Missouri; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 18% in Missouri; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.8 | 56.0 | 45.8 | bottom 49% in Missouri; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 47.8 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.32, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/30/2024 |
| Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Haas, Brian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Haas, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2025 |
| Malik, Omer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2024 |
| Malik, Omer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2024 |
| Malik, Shafiq | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Malik, Shafiq | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Smith, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
| Smith, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2024 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
- "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care Cent | 1.1 mi | Belton, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Foxwood Springs Living Center | 2.6 mi | Raymore, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sunrise Nursing & Rehabilitation | 4.6 mi | Raymore, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Grandview | 6.9 mi | Grandview, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| The Healthcare Resort of Leawood - Iron Horse HLTH | 8.0 mi | Leawood, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Raintree Village | 8.2 mi | Lees Summit, MO | —/5 | ||
| Bridgewood Health Care Center | 8.6 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Ignite Medical Resort Overland Park LLC | 8.8 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tallgrass Creek, INC | 9.3 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hilltop at Blue River, the | 9.6 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Village Shalom INC | 9.8 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Carondelet LLC | 10.2 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265782.