MissouriBelton

Beautiful Savior Home

1003 South Cedar Street, Belton, MO 64012 · Cass County · 126 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Apr 26, 2004

Part of chain: SHAFIQ MALIK (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.50
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Dec 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Dec 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
May 5, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 5, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
May 5, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 5, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
May 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 21, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202110E
2023100F
202490F
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.503.663.95bottom 46% in Missouri; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.490.69bottom 32% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.153.223.50bottom 49% in Missouri; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.160.330.48bottom 18% in Missouri; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)56.856.045.8bottom 49% in Missouri; bottom 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.32, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/30/2024
Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024
Bleauridge Nursing and Rehab LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024
Haas, BrianIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024
Haas, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/02/2025
Malik, OmerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2024
Malik, OmerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2024
Malik, ShafiqIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024
Malik, ShafiqIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024
Smith, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024
Smith, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/30/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care Cent1.1 miBelton, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Foxwood Springs Living Center2.6 miRaymore, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Sunrise Nursing & Rehabilitation4.6 miRaymore, MO★★★☆☆2/5
Life Care Center of Grandview6.9 miGrandview, MO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
The Healthcare Resort of Leawood - Iron Horse HLTH8.0 miLeawood, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Raintree Village8.2 miLees Summit, MO—/5
Bridgewood Health Care Center8.6 miKansas City, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Ignite Medical Resort Overland Park LLC8.8 miOverland Park, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Tallgrass Creek, INC9.3 miOverland Park, KS★★★★★5/5
Hilltop at Blue River, the9.6 miKansas City, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Village Shalom INC9.8 miOverland Park, KS★★★★☆2/5
Ignite Medical Resort Carondelet LLC10.2 miKansas City, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Belton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265782.