Fleetwood Post Acute

Name: Fleetwood Post Acute
Address: 200 Anne Drive, Easley, SC, 29640, US
Telephone: 8648599754

200 Anne Drive, Easley, SC 29640 · Pickens County · 103 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1971

Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$14,842

Fines, last 3 years

3.46

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 9, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 20, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 9, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Corrected: Oct 20, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 9, 2023 · F-0808 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.

Why it matters: A special diet handled without proper medical oversight may not be safe or right for the resident's condition.

Corrected: Oct 20, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (10)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 29, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 29, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 9, 2023	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2023	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2023	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 10, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
Dec 10, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Dec 10, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 1).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2021	4	0	D
2023	5	3	J ▲
2025	1	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $14,842.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Oct 9, 2023	Fine	$7,421
Oct 9, 2023	Fine	$7,421

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	South Carolina avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.46	4.08	3.95	bottom 27% in South Carolina; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.54	0.67	0.69	bottom 48% in South Carolina; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.15	3.55	3.50	bottom 37% in South Carolina; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.37	0.41	0.48	top 42% in South Carolina; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	64.9	45.9	45.8	bottom 6% in South Carolina; bottom 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	50.0	42.1	42.9	bottom 38% in South Carolina; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.07, RN 0.48, weekend 2.79. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Palmetto Community Healthcare, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	06/29/2021
Hall, Jordan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2021
Hall, Jordan	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/21/2021
Hancock, Mark	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/29/2021
Jergensen, Joshua	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2025
Jergensen, Joshua	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2025
Mitchell, John	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/29/2021
Murray, Jason	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/29/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Who oversees residents' therapeutic diets, and how do the doctor and dietitian work together on them?"
"How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
"What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Powdersville Post-Acute	3.5 mi	Easley, SC	★★★☆☆	3/5
Presbyterian Home of SC - Foothills	3.5 mi	Easley, SC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Manna Post Acute	7.0 mi	Pickens, SC	★★★☆☆	3/5
West Village Post Acute	8.5 mi	Greenville, SC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Heartland Health Care Center - Greenville East	8.8 mi	Greenville, SC	★★☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Magnolia Manor - Greenville	10.2 mi	Greenville, SC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Arboretum at the Woodlands	11.0 mi	Greenville, SC	★★★★★	5/5
Piedmont Post-Acute	11.1 mi	Piedmont, SC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Greenville Post Acute	11.3 mi	Greenville, SC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Pruitthealth - Pickens	14.1 mi	Six Mile, SC	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Easley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425018.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Fleetwood Post Acute

200 Anne Drive, Easley, SC 29640 · 8648599754

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $14,842

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Oct 9, 2023 (F-0684, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ Oct 9, 2023 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Oct 9, 2023 (F-0808, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Who oversees residents' therapeutic diets, and how do the doctor and dietitian work together on them?"
☐ "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
☐ "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 425018 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)