South CarolinaPickens

Manna Post Acute

716 E Cedar Rock St, Pickens, SC 29671 · Pickens County · 130 certified beds · avg 123 residents/day · certified since Feb 26, 1972

Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.49
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 21, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360D
202550D
202650F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.494.083.95bottom 29% in South Carolina; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.570.670.69top 47% in South Carolina; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.203.553.50bottom 41% in South Carolina; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.410.48top 41% in South Carolina; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)22.045.945.8top 2% in South Carolina; top 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.142.142.9top 15% in South Carolina; top 16% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.57, weekend 3.17. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Palmetto Community Healthcare, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/29/2021
Apt, FrederickIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Dahlhausen, DanielIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Griggs, ToddIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2009
Jergensen, JoshuaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Mitchell, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Fleetwood Post Acute7.0 miEasley, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Pruitthealth - Pickens8.8 miSix Mile, SC★★★★★4/5
Powdersville Post-Acute10.4 miEasley, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Presbyterian Home of SC - Foothills10.5 miEasley, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Heartland Health Care Center - Greenville East13.7 miGreenville, SC★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
The Arboretum at the Woodlands14.7 miGreenville, SC★★★★★5/5
West Village Post Acute14.8 miGreenville, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
River Falls Post Acute15.8 miMarietta, SC★★★☆☆4/5
Magnolia Manor - Greenville16.4 miGreenville, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Greenville Post Acute16.9 miGreenville, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Piedmont Post-Acute17.8 miPiedmont, SC★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pickens →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425084.