How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Fairburn Heights of Journey LLC
178 West Campbellton Street, Fairburn, GA 30213 (opens Google Maps) · Fulton County · (770) 964-1320· 120 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since May 7, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: JOURNEY HEALTHCARE (32 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 12, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 15, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 15, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 15, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 13, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint F-0812
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint F-0641
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint · F-0727 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint · F-0803 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint · F-0554 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint · F-0625 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint · F-0645 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint · F-0661 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint · F-0698 |
| Aug 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint · F-0809 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityGeorgia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.23
Georgia average: 3.54
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.17
Georgia average: 0.50
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 1.99
Georgia average: 3.09
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Georgia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.23 | 3.54 | 3.95 | bottom 2% in Georgia; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.17 | 0.50 | 0.69 | bottom 3% in Georgia; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 1.99 | 3.09 | 3.50 | bottom 2% in Georgia; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.48 | bottom 9% in Georgia; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.7 | 46.0 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in Georgia; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 71.4 | 44.5 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Georgia; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.94, RN 0.22, weekend 2.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.94 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Fairburn Heights of Journey LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Bees Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Ajoj Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Bees Family Irrevocable Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Blue Ocean Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Journey Ox Ga Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Journey Ox of Ga LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| McGuinness, Bernard | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Shasam Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Shasam Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Bilbo, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Bilbo, Richard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Conrad, Cameron | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Conrad, Cameron | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Davis, Tiffany | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Davis, Tiffany | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Frinks, Terence | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Frinks, Terence | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Johnson, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Johnson, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Jones, Antonio | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2024 |
Showing 20 of 38 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 18 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Journey Healthcare — 32 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Fort Valley Crossing of Journey LLC — Fort Valley, GA · overall 2/5
- Jasper Point of Journey LLC — Jasper, GA · overall 1/5
- Jesup Ridge of Journey LLC — Jesup, GA · overall 1/5
- Lagrange Trails of Journey LLC — Lagrange, GA · overall 3/5
- Murray Woods of Journey LLC — Chatsworth, GA · overall 1/5
- Reserve at Appling of Journey LLC, the — Appling, GA · overall 1/5
- Reserve at Fort Gaines of Journey LLC, the — Fort Gaines, GA · overall 2/5
- Roberta Trails of Journey LLC — Roberta, GA · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 31 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Georgia midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 38 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 27 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian City Rehabilitation Center | 3.6 mi | Union City, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pruitthealth - Fairburn | 5.8 mi | Fairburn, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer | 9.4 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Healthcare at College Park, LLC | 9.9 mi | College Park, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fayetteville Center for Nursing & Healing LLC | 10.1 mi | Fayetteville, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Riverdale Center for Nursing and Healing | 10.5 mi | Riverdale, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southland Health and Rehabilitation | 11.3 mi | Peachtree City, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Arrowhead Post Acute LLC | 11.6 mi | Jonesboro, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation | 11.8 mi | East Point, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Fulton Center for Rehabilitation LLC | 12.2 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Crestview Health & Rehab Ctr | 12.3 mi | Atlanta, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Douglasville Center for Nursing and Healing LLC | 12.5 mi | Douglasville, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Fulton, GA — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation — Atlanta, GA · overall 1/5
- Nurse Care of Buckhead — Atlanta, GA · overall 1/5SFF
- Perimeter Rehabilitation Suites by Harborview — Atlanta, GA · overall —/5SFF
- Pruitthealth - West Atlanta — Atlanta, GA · overall 1/5
- Reliable Health & Rehab at Lakewood — Atlanta, GA · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115298.