GeorgiaFairburn

Fairburn Heights of Journey LLC

178 West Campbellton Street, Fairburn, GA 30213 · Fulton County · 120 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since May 7, 1982

Part of chain: JOURNEY HEALTHCARE (32 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 15, 2022 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 13, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 19, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Jun 19, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 15, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Dec 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202251G ▲
2024130F
202530F
202690F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityGeorgia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.233.543.95bottom 2% in Georgia; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.170.500.69bottom 3% in Georgia; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing1.993.093.50bottom 2% in Georgia; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.150.350.48bottom 9% in Georgia; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.746.045.8bottom 40% in Georgia; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)71.444.542.9bottom 12% in Georgia; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.94, RN 0.22, weekend 2.64. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
3 Bees Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Ajoj Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Bees Family Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Blue Ocean TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Journey Ox Ga Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Journey Ox of Ga LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
McGuinness, BernardIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Shasam Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Shasam Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Bilbo, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2024
Bilbo, RichardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2024
Conrad, CameronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Conrad, CameronIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Davis, TiffanyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Davis, TiffanyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Frinks, TerenceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Frinks, TerenceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Johnson, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Johnson, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Jones, AntonioIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Christian City Rehabilitation Center3.6 miUnion City, GA★★★☆☆2/5
Pruitthealth - Fairburn5.8 miFairburn, GA★★☆☆☆2/5
Fountainview Ctr for Alzheimer9.4 miAtlanta, GA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Healthcare at College Park, LLC9.9 miCollege Park, GA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Fayetteville Center for Nursing & Healing LLC10.1 miFayetteville, GA★★☆☆☆3/5
Riverdale Center for Nursing and Healing10.5 miRiverdale, GA★★☆☆☆2/5
Southland Health and Rehabilitation11.3 miPeachtree City, GA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Arrowhead Post Acute LLC11.6 miJonesboro, GA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Bonterra Transitional Care & Rehabilitation11.8 miEast Point, GA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Fulton Center for Rehabilitation LLC12.2 miAtlanta, GA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fairburn →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115298.