Jasper Point of Journey LLC

Name: Jasper Point of Journey LLC
Address: 618 GENNETT DRIVE, Jasper, GA, 30143, US
Telephone: 7066926323

618 Gennett Drive, Jasper, GA 30143 · Pickens County · 60 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Dec 7, 1989

Part of chain: JOURNEY HEALTHCARE (32 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$4,233

Fines, last 3 years

2.85

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 22, 2022 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 22, 2022 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Nov 21, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 27, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 21, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jul 21, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jul 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jul 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Jul 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 29, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint
May 22, 2022	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 22, 2022	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 22, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 22, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 22, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 22, 2022	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 10).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	6	2	G ▲
2024	13	0	F
2025	10	0	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $4,233.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Oct 23, 2023	Fine	$4,233

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Georgia avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.85	3.54	3.95	bottom 14% in Georgia; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.59	0.50	0.69	top 29% in Georgia; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.56	3.09	3.50	bottom 20% in Georgia; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.58	0.35	0.48	top 10% in Georgia; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	71.7	46.0	45.8	bottom 3% in Georgia; bottom 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	75.0	44.5	42.9	bottom 10% in Georgia; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.21, RN 0.66, weekend 2.88. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
3 Bees Holdings LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Ajoj Holdings LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Bees Family Irrevocable Trust	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Blue Ocean Trust	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Journey Ox Ga Healthcare Holdings LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Journey Ox of Ga LLC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
McGuinness, Bernard	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Shasam Family Trust	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Shasam Holdings LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Bilbo, Richard	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/20/2024
Bilbo, Richard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/20/2024
Clarke, Bo	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Clarke, Bo	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Conrad, Cameron	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Conrad, Cameron	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Dykes, Michael	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Dykes, Michael	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Frinks, Terence	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Frinks, Terence	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Johnson, Jennifer	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Pruitthealth - Jasper	7.1 mi	Jasper, GA	★★★★★	4/5
Wildwood Health and Rehab	9.9 mi	Talking Rock, GA	★★★☆☆	5/5
Parkside Center for Nursing and Rehab at Ellijay	13.6 mi	Ellijay, GA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Canton Center for Nursing and Healing LLC	16.7 mi	Canton, GA	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Cherokee Center for Nursing and Healing LLC	17.6 mi	Canton, GA	★★☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Jasper →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115502.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Jasper Point of Journey LLC

618 Gennett Drive, Jasper, GA 30143 · 7066926323

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $4,233

Most serious findings on record:

▲ May 22, 2022 (F-0656, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
▲ May 22, 2022 (F-0697, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 115502 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)