430 Rivers Avenue, Eufaula, AL 36027 (opens Google Maps) · Barbour County · (334) 687-6627· 180 certified beds · avg 161 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1977 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: CROWNE HEALTH CARE (18 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 20, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 10, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Nov 10, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · F-0602 |
| Jul 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 2, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 2, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| May 2, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 2, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 2, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 2, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $42,884, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2024 | Fine | $42,884 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | Payment Denial | 96 days from Oct 19, 2024 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.48 | 4.43 | 3.95 | top 48% in Alabama; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 34% in Alabama; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.64 | 3.73 | 3.50 | bottom 43% in Alabama; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.48 | top 46% in Alabama; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.4 | 46.9 | 45.8 | top 13% in Alabama; top 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 39.5 | 42.9 | top 34% in Alabama; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.63, weekend 2.89.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.56 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Crowne Health Care of Eufaula. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crowne Operations, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2003 |
| Jennifer Jones McInnish Family Dynasty Trust #1 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2016 |
| Richard Bryan Jones Family Dynasty Trust #1 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2016 |
| Crowne Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/11/2010 |
| Dunnam, Noel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2015 |
| Dunnam, Noel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2015 |
| Jones, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2015 |
| Jones, Richard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2015 |
| Manning, Marcus | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2015 |
| Railey, Linda | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/10/2009 |
| Wilder, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2003 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Crowne Health Care — 18 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 17 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve at Fort Gaines of Journey LLC, the | 20.7 mi | Fort Gaines, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Joe-Anne Burgin Health and Rehabilitation | 22.8 mi | Cuthbert, GA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Henry County Health and Rehabilitation Facility | 23.7 mi | Abbeville, AL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Four County Health and Rehabilitation | 31.4 mi | Richland, GA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Calhoun Nursing Home | 33.8 mi | Edison, GA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Southern Springs Healthcare Facility | 35.6 mi | Union Springs, AL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Early Memorial Nursing Facility | 37.7 mi | Blakely, GA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Canterbury Health Care Facility | 39.5 mi | Phenix City, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015199.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details