How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
212 Dothan Road, Abbeville, AL 36310 (opens Google Maps) · Henry County · (334) 585-2241· 142 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Dec 12, 1980 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. F-0700
The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. F-0758
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Feb 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Feb 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 16, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 16, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| May 16, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 14, 2018 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Jun 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 14, 2018 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (3 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2019 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.95 | 4.43 | 3.95 | top 1% in Alabama; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.69 | top 26% in Alabama; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.08 | 3.73 | 3.50 | top 2% in Alabama; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.48 | top 29% in Alabama; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.6 | 46.9 | 45.8 | top 35% in Alabama; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 8.3 | 39.5 | 42.9 | top 3% in Alabama; top 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.02, RN 0.72, weekend 4.29.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.02 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Henry County Health and Rehabilitation Facility. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - County
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry County Health Care Authority | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 12/12/1980 |
| Cleveland, Hollie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2016 |
| Gamble, Dwight | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Houston, Charlie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2004 |
| Houston, Charlie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2025 |
| Kelley, Dianne | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/2015 |
| McCoy, Christopher | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2014 |
| McNaughton, Craig | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2018 |
| Money, Marquita | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2006 |
| Smith, Betty | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2006 |
| Tye, Judy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2006 |
| Vaughn, Cora | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/13/2013 |
| Weber, Dennis | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2018 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve at Fort Gaines of Journey LLC, the | 12.4 mi | Fort Gaines, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015373.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details