ConnecticutPlymouth

Cook Willow Health & Rehabilitation Center, INC.

81 Hillside Avenue, Plymouth, CT 06782 · Naugatuck Vly County · 60 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1991

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.16
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 12, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Feb 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Feb 6, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Feb 6, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 6, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Nov 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Nov 22, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Nov 22, 2021B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130D
2024100F
202590E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.163.803.95top 26% in Connecticut; top 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.990.700.69top 17% in Connecticut; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.393.433.50top 42% in Connecticut; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.460.48top 29% in Connecticut; top 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.837.445.8bottom 34% in Connecticut; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.538.642.9top 46% in Connecticut; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.97, RN 0.94, weekend 3.24. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Macdonald, SusanIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/1975
Le Clair, JennesaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/18/1989
Le Clair, JennesaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/18/1989
Le Clair, JennesaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2004
Macdonald, SusanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1975
Macdonald, SusanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1975
Macdonald, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1975
Macdonald, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1975
Macdonald, WalterIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/15/1990
Oh, Jong GilIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2007
Oh, Jong GilIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2007

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill5.4 miWaterbury, CT★★★★☆3/5
Ingraham Manor Rehab and Nursing5.8 miBristol, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Pines at Bristol for Nursing & Rehabilitation, the6.1 miBristol, CT★★★★☆3/5
Waterbury Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC6.4 miWaterbury, CT★★★★★4/5
Apple Rehab Watertown6.6 miWatertown, CT★★★★☆4/5
Civita Care Sheriden Woods7.1 miBristol, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Village Green Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center8.0 miBristol, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Middlebury9.4 miMiddlebury, CT★★★★★5/5
Cheshire House Health Care Facility & Rehab Center9.5 miWaterbury, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Summit at Plantsville Center for Health & Rehabili10.0 miPlantsville, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Plymouth →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075349.